首页> 外文OA文献 >Does climate aid affect emissions? Evidence from a global dataset
【2h】

Does climate aid affect emissions? Evidence from a global dataset

机译:气候援助会影响排放吗?来自全球数据集的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Donor countries have been using international aid in the field of energy for at least three decades now. The stated objective of this policy is to reduce emissions and promote sustainable development in the global south. In spite of the widespread use of this policy tool, very little is known about its effect on emissions. In this paper we perform an empirical audit of the effectiveness of climate aid in tackling CO2 and SO2 emissions. Using a global panel dataset covering up to 131 countries over the period 1961 to 2011 and estimating a parsimonious model using the Anderson and Hsiao estimator we do not find any evidence of a systematic effect of energy related aid on emissions. We also find that the non-effect is not conditional on institutional quality or level of income. Countries located in Europe and Central Asia does better than others in utilising climate aid to reduce CO2 emissions. Our results are robust after controlling for the Environmental Kuznets Curve, country fixed effects, country specific trends, and time varying common shocks.
机译:捐助国在能源领域一直使用国际援助至少已有三十年了。该政策的既定目标是减少排放并促进全球南方的可持续发展。尽管该政策工具得到了广泛使用,但对其排放的影响知之甚少。在本文中,我们对气候援助在解决CO2和SO2排放方面的有效性进行了实证审核。使用1961年至2011年期间覆盖131个国家的全球面板数据集,并使用Anderson和Hsiao估算器估算简约模型,我们没有发现任何证据表明与能源相关的援助会对排放产生系统性影响。我们还发现,非影响并非以制度质量或收入水平为条件。欧洲和中亚国家在利用气候援助减少二氧化碳排放方面比其他国家做得更好。在控制环境库兹涅茨曲线,国家固定效应,国家特定趋势和时变常见冲击之后,我们的结果是可靠的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号