首页> 外文OA文献 >Human rights, self-formation and resistance in struggles against disposability: grounding Foucault’s ‘theorizing practice’ of counter-conduct in Bhopal
【2h】

Human rights, self-formation and resistance in struggles against disposability: grounding Foucault’s ‘theorizing practice’ of counter-conduct in Bhopal

机译:人权,自我形成和反对可剥夺性的斗争中的抵抗:使福柯在博帕尔的反行为“理论化实践”基础

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Theorising how human rights function as a liberal governing technology has undoubtedly been an important contribution of “governmentality studies”. Such theorisation, however, has largely eschewed concerted examination of the mobilisation and impact of human rights in historically specific struggles. This has tended to divorce the theoretical concerns of critical rights scholarship from the specificity of political struggles, reifying rights and obscuring the agency of “the governed” in struggles against socio-economic disposability. Calling for greater attention to human rights' potential destabilisations of conduct, the article examines Foucault's work into forms of resistance to “power that conducts”—“counter-conduct”—which is increasingly inspiring wide-ranging analyses of resistances to conducting power. Bringing together the “theorising practice” of counter-conduct and the enduring campaigns for justice by survivors and activists of the 1984 Bhopal gas disaster, the article examines how human rights enable forms of self-formation that interrupt the subjectification of those constructed as disposable subjects. Illuminating survivors' intervention in their ethical self-transfiguration mitigates against the occlusion of the agency of the governed. Moreover, the article argues, the thinking of counter-conduct recalibrates Foucault's own methodological orientations away from an overwhelming focus on mechanisms of governmental power, towards the study of the counter-conductive practices of co-governing subjects.
机译:从理论上讲,人权如何作为一种自由的统治技术发挥作用,无疑是“政府研究”的重要贡献。但是,这种理论化很大程度上避开了在历史上特定的斗争中对人权的动员和影响的一致研究。这倾向于将批判权利学术的理论关注与政治斗争的特殊性,权利的统一化以及在反对社会经济可支配性的斗争中使“被统治者”的机构相分离。这篇文章呼吁人们更加关注人权潜在的破坏行为的行为,将福柯的工作研究为对“行为权力”的抵制形式,即“反行​​为”,这日益激发了人们对行为权力抵制的广泛分析。本文将反行为的“理论实践”与1984年博帕尔瓦斯灾难的幸存者和活动家们进行的持久正义运动相结合,探讨了人权如何使自我形成的形式中断那些被视为一次性主体的人们的主体化。启发幸存者对他们的道德自我变形的干预,可以减轻被统治者机构的封锁。而且,文章认为,反导思想重新校准了福柯自己的方法论取向,从对政府权力机制的压倒性关注转向对共同管理主体的反导实践的研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Odysseos Louiza;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号