首页> 外文OA文献 >Regional Monopoly and Interregional and Intraregional Competition: The Parallel Trade in Coca-Cola between Shanghai and Hangzhou in China
【2h】

Regional Monopoly and Interregional and Intraregional Competition: The Parallel Trade in Coca-Cola between Shanghai and Hangzhou in China

机译:区域垄断与区际和区域内竞争:中国上海与杭州可口可乐的平行贸易

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article uses a “principal-agent-subagent” analytical framework and data that were collected from field surveys in China to (1) investigate the nature and causes of the parallel trade in Coca-Cola between Shanghai and Hangzhou and (2) assess the geographic and theoretical implications for the regional monopolies that have been artificially created by Coca-Cola in China. The parallel trade in Coca-Cola is sustained by its intraregional rivalry with Pepsi-Cola in Shanghai, where Coca-Cola (China) (the principal) seeks to maximize its share of the Shanghai soft-drinks market. This goal effectively supersedes the market-division strategy of Coca-Cola (China), since the gap in wholesale prices between the Shanghai and Hangzhou markets is higher than the transaction costs of engaging in parallel trade. The exclusive distributor of Coca-Cola in the Shanghai market (the subagent) makes opportunistic use of a situation in which it does not have to bear the financial consequences of the major residual claimants (the principal and other agents) and has an incentive to enter the nondesignated Coca-Cola market of Hangzhou by crossing the geographic boundary between the two regional monopolies devised by Coca-Cola. The existence of parallel trade in Coca-Cola promotes interregional competition between the Shanghai and Hangzhou bottlers (the agents). This article enhances an understanding of the economic geography of spatial equilibrium, disequilibrium, and quasi-equilibrium of a transnational corporation's distribution system and its artificially created market boundary in China.
机译:本文使用“主代理-子代理”分析框架和从中国现场调查中收集的数据来(1)研究上海和杭州之间可口可乐平行贸易的性质和原因,以及(2)评估可口可乐的平行贸易。可口可乐在中国人为创造的区域垄断的地理和理论意义。可口可乐与上海百事可乐的区域内竞争维持了可口可乐的平行贸易,可口可乐(中国)(负责人)力图在上海寻求最大的份额,从而在上海软饮料市场中占有最大份额。这个目标有效地取代了可口可乐(中国)的市场划分策略,因为上海和杭州市场之间的批发价格差距高于从事平行贸易的交易成本。可口可乐在上海市场的独家分销商(子代理商)利用机会免于承担主要剩余索偿人(委托人和其他代理商)的财务后果,并有动机进入跨越可口可乐设计的两个区域性垄断之间的地理边界,形成杭州未指定的可口可乐市场。可口可乐平行贸易的存在促进了上海和杭州装瓶商(代理商)之间的区域间竞争。本文增进了对跨国公司分销系统及其在中国人为创造的市场边界的空间均衡,不均衡和准均衡的经济地理学的理解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yeung Godfrey; Mok Vincent;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号