首页> 外文OA文献 >Capping Your Rights: The Texas Statute of Non-Economic Damage Caps in Medical Malpractice Cases and Its Assault on the Rights of the Injured and the Power of the Courts (Comment)
【2h】

Capping Your Rights: The Texas Statute of Non-Economic Damage Caps in Medical Malpractice Cases and Its Assault on the Rights of the Injured and the Power of the Courts (Comment)

机译:限制你的权利:德克萨斯州医疗事故案件中的非经济损害赔偿规定及其对受害者权利和法院权力的攻击(评论)

摘要

This comment will discuss the effect non-economic damage caps in medical malpractice cases have on an injured victim's rights to bring a cause of action against a negligent party. Part II will discuss the origins of Texas non-economic damage caps in medical malpractice cases, the Texas Legislature's reasons for enacting them, and how Texas courts have interpreted the caps. Part III will enumerate the rights threatened by the non-economic damages caps and the recently passed companion constitutional amendment. It illustrates the unconstitutional aspects of the cap pertaining to the Equal Protection, the Open Courts Doctrine, the Right of Trial by Jury, the Prohibition of Special Laws, the Separation of Powers and conflicting constitutional provisions. This section will also discuss the insurance industry's success in the political arena. Part IV will discuss proposals for medical malpractice lawsuit reform, reducing insurance rates and making health care available to every person. Specifically, it will discuss a patient compensation fund and the passage of insurance rate regulations. Lastly, Part V will conclude with a summation of the statute's unconstitutionality and the need to address the current assault on medical malpractice victims' rights and the power of the courts.
机译:该评论将讨论医疗事故案件中的非经济损害赔偿上限对受害受害者提起针对过失方提起诉讼的权利的影响。第二部分将讨论医疗事故案中德克萨斯州非经济损害赔偿上限的由来,德克萨斯州立法机关颁布这些赔偿理由的原因,以及德克萨斯州法院如何解释该上限。第三部分将列举非经济损害赔偿上限和最近通过的伴随宪法修正案所威胁的权利。它说明了与平等保护,公开法院原则,陪审团审判权,禁止特别法,分权和宪法规定相抵触的上限的违宪方面。本节还将讨论保险业在政治领域的成功。第四部分将讨论医疗事故诉讼改革,降低保险费率以及向所有人提供医疗保健的建议。具体来说,它将讨论患者赔偿基金和保险费率规定的通过。最后,第五部分将总结法规的违宪性,以及解决当前对医疗事故受害者权利和法院权力的侵犯的必要性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ruben James Reyes;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English, en-US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号