首页> 外文OA文献 >Journalistic self-regulation in Australia: is it ready for the information society?
【2h】

Journalistic self-regulation in Australia: is it ready for the information society?

机译:澳大利亚的新闻自律:它是否为信息社会做好准备?

摘要

This article examines the system of journalistic accountability in Australia, evaluating its capacity to promote `the highest ethical and professional standardsu27 seen as fundamental to achieving the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) vision for an inclusive information society. First, it outlines the approach to media and journalistic accountability adopted in Australia. It then analyses a representative sample of journalism codes of ethics and codes of practice, classifying them according to their approaches to self-regulation, the key characteristics of the codes and the approaches to dispute resolution adopted. The findings of this analysis are then compared with best practice in self-regulation criteria distilled from the Taskforce on Industry Self-Regulation to identify potential problems with the current scheme of journalistic self-regulation. These criteria are then critiqued, identifying a range of problems in relation to the schemeu27s capacity to promote information society objectives as articulated by the WSIS in relation to the role of traditional and new media.
机译:本文研究了澳大利亚的新闻责任制,评估了其促进“最高道德和专业标准”的能力,这对于实现信息社会世界峰会(WSIS)的包容性信息社会愿景至关重要。首先,它概述了澳大利亚采用的媒体和新闻责任制方法。然后,它分析了新闻道德守则和行为守则的代表性样本,并根据它们的自我调节方法,守则的主要特征和采用的争端解决方法对它们进行了分类。然后,将该分析的结果与行业自我监管工作组中提炼的自我监管标准的最佳实践进行比较,以发现当前新闻业自我监管方案的潜在问题。然后对这些标准进行了批评,确定了WSIS针对传统和新媒体的作用提出的该计划促进信息社会目标能力的一系列问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Breit Rhonda;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号