首页> 外文OA文献 >The distractor frequency effect in picture–word interference: evidence for response exclusion
【2h】

The distractor frequency effect in picture–word interference: evidence for response exclusion

机译:图片 - 词干扰中的干扰器频率效应:响应排除的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In 3 experiments, subjects named pictures with low- or high-frequency superimposed distractor words. In a 1st experiment, we replicated the finding that low-frequency words induce more interference in picture naming than high-frequency words (i.e., distractor frequency effect; Miozzo & Caramazza, 2003). According to the response exclusion hypothesis, this effect has its origin at a postlexical stage and is related to a response buffer. The account predicts that the distractor frequency effect should only be present when a response to the word enters the response buffer. This was tested by masking the distractor (Experiment 2) and by presenting it at various time points before stimulus onset (Experiment 3). Results supported the hypothesis by showing that the effect was only present when distractors were visible, and if they were presented in close proximity to the target picture. These results have implications for the models of lexical access and for the tasks that can be used to study this process.
机译:在3个实验中,受试者使用低频或高频叠加干扰词来命名图片。在第一个实验中,我们重复了这一发现,即低频词比高频词在图片命名中引起更多的干扰(即干扰频率效应; Miozzo&Caramazza,2003)。根据响应排除假设,此效应的产生起源于词后阶段,与响应缓冲区有关。该帐户预测,仅当对该单词的响应进入响应缓冲区时,才会出现干扰频率效应。通过掩盖干扰物(实验2)并在刺激发作之前的各个时间点展示干扰物(实验3)进行了测试。结果表明该效果仅在可见干扰物时以及在紧贴目标图片的情况下才存在,从而支持了该假设。这些结果对词汇访问模型以及可用于研究此过程的任务产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号