首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of segmentation techniques remotely sensed images for land cover features
【2h】

Comparison of segmentation techniques remotely sensed images for land cover features

机译:土地覆盖特征遥感影像分割技术的比较

摘要

This study presents the comparison of edge and region-based segmentation approaches in segmenting linear and polygonal land cover features respectively in optical, single polarization SAR, and multi-polarization SAR images which covered the area of Asajaya, Sarawak and Kuala Nerus, Terengganu. To segment the linear features, the procedures included: edge detection, edge map transformation, edge thinning, and edge linking. From the results obtained, the kernel-based first derivative (i.e. Frei-Chen, Kirsch, Prewitt, and Sobel) gave the better outcomes based on the identification accuracy computed. The segmentation was, however, bounded by two factors: (l) the sensitivity of edge detectors to image texture and (2) the characteristics of input data. For polygonal features, three different region-based segmentors, namely centroid linkage region grower, split-and-merge, and morphological watershed transform, were applied to the following inputs: (1) spectral (or SAR backscattering) data alone, (2) texture data alone, and (3) combined spectral (or SAR backscattering) and textural data. In this study, it was found that the centroid linkage region growing was superior to the split-and-merge and watershed transform. The Landsat-5 TM and TOPSAR data, with their multichannel information, gave the better segmentation results. The segmentation was difficult for both ERS-l and Radarsat images due to their only single channel information. An improvement was achieved by the incorporation of the textural information where the combined spectral (or SAR backscattering) and textural input yielded lower errors than that of using spectral (or SAR backscattering) or textural data alone.
机译:这项研究提出了分别在光学,单极化SAR和多极化SAR图像中分割线性和多边形土地覆盖特征的基于边缘和区域的分割方法的比较,这些图像覆盖了Asajaya,砂拉越和Terengganu的Neur。为了分割线性特征,过程包括:边缘检测,边缘图变换,边缘细化和边缘链接。根据获得的结果,基于核的一阶导数(即Frei-Chen,Kirsch,Prewitt和Sobel)基于计算出的识别精度给出了更好的结果。但是,分割受两个因素限制:(1)边缘检测器对图像纹理的敏感度和(2)输入数据的特征。对于多边形要素,将三个不同的基于区域的分割器(即质心链接区域增长器,拆分合并和形态学分水岭变换)应用于以下输入:(1)仅光谱(或SAR反向散射)数据,(2) (3)结合光谱(或SAR反向散射)和纹理数据。在这项研究中,发现质心链接区域的生长优于拆分合并和分水岭变换。 Landsat-5 TM和TOPSAR数据及其多通道信息可以提供更好的分割结果。由于ERS-1和Radarsat图像只有单个通道信息,因此很难分割。通过合并纹理信息实现了改进,其中组合频谱(或SAR反向散射)和纹理输入产生的误差比单独使用频谱(或SAR反向散射)或纹理数据产生的误差低。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lee Ken Yoong;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2003
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号