首页> 外文OA文献 >A Comparison of Two Biotic Indices, AMBI and BOPA/BO2A, for assessing the Ecological Quality Status (EcoQS) of Benthic Macro-invertebrates
【2h】

A Comparison of Two Biotic Indices, AMBI and BOPA/BO2A, for assessing the Ecological Quality Status (EcoQS) of Benthic Macro-invertebrates

机译:比较两个生物指标AMBI和BOPA / BO2A,以评估底栖大型无脊椎动物的生态质量状况(EcoQS)

摘要

1. The assessment of quality status of Transitional Aquatic Ecosystems remains a challenge for the ecologists. 2. Here, we compared the results of two common indices (AMBI - Ecological Groups and BOPA/BO2A -Taxonomic Sufficiency) from samples coming from the north-eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea. Both biotic indices rely on distinct assessments of species sensitivity/tolerance. 3. Six studies provided the raw data that permitted AMBI and BOPA to be compared. A total 922 data element was available, most of them from the Seine estuary (78%). The database was later divided into three sub-sets: French Atlantic Transitional Waters, Mediterranean Coastal Waters and Mediterranean Lagoons. 4. Both indices' values demonstrated a strong correlation; however, the BOPA index had a tendency to overestimate the EcoQS compared to the values obtained from AMBI index, mainly due to discrepancies between ‘high’ and ‘good’ quality. 5. New thresholds for BOPA/BO2A index are proposed in order to reduce this overestimation.
机译:1.对过渡水生生态系统质量状况的评估仍然是生态学家所面临的挑战。 2.在这里,我们比较了来自东北大西洋和地中海的两个共同指标(AMBI-生态族群和BOPA / BO2A-毒理学上的充足性)的结果。这两种生物指数都依赖于对物种敏感性/耐受性的不同评估。 3.六项研究提供了原始数据,可以比较AMBI和BOPA。共有922个数据元素,其中大部分来自塞纳河河口(占78%)。该数据库后来分为三个子集:法国大西洋过渡水域,地中海沿岸水域和地中海泻湖。 4.两个指数的值显示出很强的相关性;但是,与从AMBI指数获得的值相比,BOPA指数倾向于高估EcoQS,这主要是由于“高质量”和“良好”之间的差异。 5.提出了BOPA / BO2A指数的新阈值,以减少这种高估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号