首页> 外文OA文献 >Packaging waste recycling in Europe: is the industry paying for it?
【2h】

Packaging waste recycling in Europe: is the industry paying for it?

机译:欧洲的包装废料回收:该行业是否为此付出代价?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper describes and examines the schemes established in five EU countries for the recycling of packaging waste. The changes in packaging waste management were mainly implemented since the Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste entered into force. The analysis of the five systems allowed the authors to identify very different approaches to cope with the same problem: meet the recovery and recycling targets imposed by EU law. Packaging waste is a responsibility of the industry. However, local governments are generally in charge of waste management, particularly in countries with Green Dot schemes or similar extended producer responsibility systems. This leads to the need of establishing a system of financial transfers between the industry and the local governments (particularly regarding the extra costs involved with selective collection and sorting). Using the same methodological approach, the authors also compare the costs and benefits of recycling from the perspective of local public authorities for France, Portugal and Romania. Since the purpose of the current paper is to take note of who is paying for the incremental costs of recycling and whether the industry (i.e. the consumer) is paying for the net financial costs of packaging waste management, environmental impacts are not included in the analysis. The work carried out in this paper highlights some aspects that are prone to be improved and raises several questions that will require further research. In the three countries analyzed more closely in this paper the industry is not paying the net financial cost of packaging waste management. In fact, if the savings attained by diverting packaging waste from other treatment (e.g. landfilling) and the public subsidies to the investment on the “recycling system” are not considered, it seems that the industry should increase the financial support to local authorities (by 125% in France, 50% in Portugal and 170% in Romania). However, in France and Portugal the industry is paying local authorities more than just the incremental costs of recycling (full costs of selective collection and sorting minus the avoided costs). To provide a more definitive judgment on the fairness of the systems it will be necessary to assess the cost efficiency of waste management operators (and judge whether operators are claiming costs or eliciting “prices”).
机译:本文介绍并研究了在五个欧盟国家/地区建立的包装废弃物回收计划。自有关包装和包装废物的94/62 / EC指令生效以来,包装废物管理的变更主要得到实施。通过对这五个系统的分析,作者可以找到非常不同的方法来应对同一问题:达到欧盟法律规定的回收和再循环目标。包装废料是行业的责任。但是,地方政府通常负责废物管理,尤其是在拥有绿点计划或类似的扩展生产者责任制的国家。这导致需要建立行业与地方政府之间的财务转移系统(特别是关于选择性收集和分类所涉及的额外成本)。使用相同的方法,作者还从法国,葡萄牙和罗马尼亚的地方公共机构的角度比较了回收的成本和收益。由于本文的目的是要注意谁在为回收的增量成本付款,以及该行业(即消费者)是否在为包装废物管理的净财务成本付款,因此对环境的影响未包括在分析中。本文所进行的工作突出了一些易于改进的方面,并提出了一些需要进一步研究的问题。在本文中进行了更详细分析的三个国家中,该行业没有支付包装废弃物管理的净财务成本。实际上,如果不考虑通过将包装废料从其他处理(例如垃圾填埋)中转移而节省下来的费用,以及不考虑对“回收系统”进行投资的公共补贴,那么该行业似乎应该增加对地方当局的财政支持(通过法国为125%,葡萄牙为50%,罗马尼亚为170%)。但是,在法国和葡萄牙,该行业向地方政府支付的不仅仅是回收的增量成本(选择性收集和分类的全部成本减去避免的成本)。为了对系统的公平性做出更明确的判断,有必要评估废物管理经营者的成本效率(并判断经营者是在要求成本还是在引起“价格”)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号