首页> 外文OA文献 >Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study
【2h】

Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study

机译:生物仿制药ABP 501与阿达木单抗在中度至重度类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性:一项随机,双盲,III期等效研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives ABP 501 is a Food and Drug Administration-approved biosimilar to adalimumab; structural, functional and pharmacokinetic evaluations have shown that the two are highly similar. We report results from a phase III study comparing efficacy, safety and immunogenicity between ABP 501 and adalimumab.udududMethods In this randomised, double-blind, active comparator-controlled, 26-week equivalence study, patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate were randomised (1:1) to ABP 501 or adalimumab (40 mg) every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint was risk ratio (RR) of ACR20 between groups at week 24. Primary hypothesis that the treatments were equivalent would be confirmed if the 90% CI for RR of ACR20 at week 24 fell between 0.738 and 1.355, demonstrating that ABP 501 is similar to adalimumab. Secondary endpoints included Disease Activity Score 28-joint count-C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP). Safety was assessed via adverse events (AEs) and laboratory evaluations. Antidrug antibodies were assessed to determine immunogenicity.udududResults A total of 526 patients were randomised (n=264, ABP 501; n=262 adalimumab) and 494 completed the study. ACR20 response at week 24 was 74.6% (ABP 501) and 72.4% (adalimumab). At week 24, the RR of ACR20 (90% CI) between groups was 1.039 (0.954, 1.133), confirming the primary hypothesis. Changes from baseline in DAS28-CRP, ACR50 and ACR70 were similar. There were no clinically meaningful differences in AEs and laboratory abnormalities. A total of 38.3% (ABP 501) and 38.2% (adalimumab) of patients tested positive for binding antidrug antibodies.udududConclusions Results from this study demonstrate that ABP 501 is similar to adalimumab in clinical efficacy, safety and immunogenicity in patients with moderate to severe RA.
机译:目标ABP 501是食品药品监督管理局批准的阿达木单抗生物仿制药;结构,功能和药代动力学评估表明,两者高度相似。我们报告了一项III期研究的结果,该研究比较了ABP 501和阿达木单抗之间的疗效,安全性和免疫原性。 ud ud ud方法在这项随机,双盲,积极的由对照者进行的为期26周的等效研究中,中度至重度患者每两周将甲氨蝶呤治疗的活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)随机(1:1)分配到ABP 501或阿达木单抗(40μmg)。主要终点指标是第24周各组之间ACR20的风险比(RR)。如果在24周时ACR20的RR的90%CI介于0.738和1.355之间,则可以证实治疗等同的主要假设,这表明ABP 501相似去阿达木单抗。次要终点包括疾病活动评分28-关节计数C反应蛋白(DAS28-CRP)。通过不良事件(AE)和实验室评估来评估安全性。结果评估了总共526例患者(n = 264,ABP 501; n = 262 adalimumab),其中494名患者完成了研究。第24周的ACR20响应为74.6%(ABP 501)和72.4%(阿达木单抗)。在第24周,两组之间ACR20的RR(90%CI)为1.039(0.954,1.133),证实了主要假设。 DAS28-CRP,ACR50和ACR70与基线的变化相似。不良事件和实验室异常在临床上没有有意义的差异。结论:总共有38.3%(ABP 501)和38.2%(adalimumab)的患者结合抗药性抗体检测为阳性。中度至重度RA患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号