首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparative study of spectral embedding methods for triangle meshes
【2h】

A comparative study of spectral embedding methods for triangle meshes

机译:三角网格光谱嵌入方法的比较研究

摘要

In order to have a better understanding and use of the strengths and weaknesses of different spectral approaches in the field of geometry processing and analysis, this preliminary comparative study investigates the behaviors of four spectral embedding methods: Global Point Signatures Embedding (GPSE), Heat Kernel Signature Embedding (HKSE), Multi-Dimensional Scaling Embedding (MDSE), and Spectral Embedding using Gaussian-filtered affinity matrices (SEG), by applying them onto three applications. Therefore experimental observations are obtained based on the limited test cases. For the mesh segmentation, HKSE and GPSE tend to outperform MDSE and SEG with better segments and boundaries. For the symmetry detection, all the embedding methods produce similar results. For the shape correspondence, MDSE and SEG show better performance and more stability than GPSE and HKSE. All in all, there is no single one embedding method that clearly outperforms the others across all three applications.
机译:为了更好地理解和利用几何处理和分析领域中不同光谱方法的优缺点,此初步比较研究研究了四种光谱嵌入方法的行为:全局点签名嵌入(GPSE),热核通过将高斯滤波的亲和矩阵(SEG)应用于三个应用,可以进行签名嵌入(HKSE),多维缩放嵌入(MDSE)和频谱嵌入。因此,基于有限的测试案例获得了实验观察结果。对于网格分割,HKSE和GPSE倾向于以更好的分割和边界胜过MDSE和SEG。对于对称检测,所有嵌入方法均产生相似的结果。对于形状对应,MDSE和SEG比GPSE和HKSE表现出更好的性能和更高的稳定性。总而言之,在所有三个应用程序中,没有一种嵌入方法明显优于其他嵌入方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Li Xiaoming;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号