首页> 外文OA文献 >Analysis of co-firing biomass with South African coal in pulverised coal boilers
【2h】

Analysis of co-firing biomass with South African coal in pulverised coal boilers

机译:煤粉锅炉中生物质与南非煤共烧的分析

摘要

In this study, the effect on the extent of emissions reduction with co-combustion ofudsmall proportions (0-20%) of biomass with coal in a pulverised fuel combustor, isudinvestigated. Such emissions include CO2, SO2 and NOx. South African coal hasudhigh ash content and low volatile content that affects its ignitability. The effect ofudbiomass co-firing on ignitability and slagging is also investigated. While higherudpercentages of biomass could reduce emissions more and improve ignitability,udbiomass tends to increase the undesirable fouling and slagging propensities, henceudlimiting the amount of biomass that can be co-fired.udTwo types of biomass, namely grass and sawdust (calorific value 16-18 MJ/kg), andudone coal (calorific value 21 MJ/kg) were used in this study. Combustion tests wereudcarried out using the Eskom 1 MW Pilot Scale combustion Test Facility (PSCTF).udThe coal chosen was representative of an average coal burned at the Eskom’s coalfiredudpower stations. For each of the types of biomass, three blends of biomass andudcoal were used, resulting in seven different feed fuels including coal alone. Theudratios of biomass to coal, on an energy basis, in the three blends were 10%:90%,ud15%:85% and 20%:80%. Seven tests were also carried out with the same fuelsudusing a drop tube furnace (DTF) to determine the reaction kinetics of the baselineudcoal and its three different blends with each type of biomass. The reactionudparameters obtained from these tests were used as input data in numericaludsimulations of the tests. Simulation using CFD software was used to predictudcombustion characteristics of each fuel in the PSCTF, which in turn can beudextrapolated to predict the performance in a full scale commercial boiler. Theudsimulation results were validated by the experimental data from the PSCTF;udcomparison of the combustion and emissions characteristics with experimental dataudfrom the PSCTF showed that the simulation procedure was capable of predictingudthese characteristics with generally good accuracy. The results coming out of this work are positive. Co-firing with grass at the PSCTFudwas found to reduce the emissions by between 13% and 50% for NOX, between 12%udand 23% for CO2 and between 21% and 29% for SO2 as the proportion of biomassudincreased from 10% to 20%. The maximum emissions reduction for sawdustudoccurred at 20% co-firing ratio; these are, 29% for NOx, 17% for CO2 and 15% forudSO2.udFor grass based co-firing, the combustion efficiency of the coal used was improvedudby 0.55% and 0.62% for 15% and 20% co-firing ratios respectively; whereas that ofudsawdust was between 0.78% and 0.38% as co-firing ratio was increased from 10%udto 20%. Combustion efficiency for 10% grass dropped by 0.65%. The DTF resultsudindicate that both grass and sawdust were able to improve the ignitability of the coaludused in a temperature range of 1000°C to 1200°C. The combustion efficiencyuddetermined from DTF results for this range indicate an improvement of betweenud0.1% and 1.4% for grass and between 0.8% and 2.45% for sawdust. The QEMSCANudanalysis of slag deposits when co-firing biomass indicated that they should generallyudbe weak enough to be handled by soot blowing equipment.udIn conclusion grass (herbaceous) biomass resulted in greater emissions reductionsudthan sawdust (ligneous). It was also found that slagging would be less of a problemudwhen using grass, because the slag deposits are more friable than those of sawdust.udAt higher co-firing ratios grass based co-firing was found to improve coal ignitabilityudbetter than that can be achieved with sawdust. The optimum co-firing ratio with grassudwould appear to be about 15% on an energy basis.udThis project was carried out to obtain fundamental technical information on some ofudthe salient effects of using biomass co-firing with pulverised power station coal.udBefore any implementation can be carried out, the next step would be to conduct auddetailed technical and economic feasibility study into possible large-scaleudapplications, using full systems engineering principles.
机译:在这项研究中,研究了粉状燃料燃烧室中小比例(0-20%)的生物质与煤共燃烧对减排程度的影响。这些排放物包括CO2,SO2和NOx。南非煤的灰分含量高,挥发分含量低,影响了其可燃性。还研究了 udbiomass共烧对可燃性和排渣的影响。虽然较高的生物质百分比可以进一步减少排放并改善可燃性,但是 udbiomass往往会增加不良的结垢和结渣倾向,因此 ududable可以共烧的生物质数量。 ud两种生物质,即草和锯末(发热量16-18 MJ / kg)和 udone煤(发热量21 MJ / kg)用于本研究。 Eskom 1 MW中试燃烧试验设施(PSCTF)进行了燃烧试验。 ud所选择的煤代表了Eskom的燃煤 udpower电站平均燃烧的煤。对于每种类型的生物质,都使用了三种生物质和 udcoal的混合物,从而产生了包括煤炭在内的七种不同的进料燃料。在三种混合燃料中,以能源为基准,生物质对煤炭的消耗率分别为10%:90%, ud15%:85%和20%:80%。还使用滴管炉(DTF)对相同的燃料进行了7次测试,以确定基线 udcoal及其三种不同混合物与每种生物质的反应动力学。从这些测试中获得的反应/参数被用作测试的数值/模拟中的输入数据。使用CFD软件进行的模拟用于预测PSCTF中每种燃料的燃烧特性,然后可以对其进行反推以预测全尺寸商用锅炉的性能。仿真结果由PSCTF的实验数据验证; 燃烧和排放特性与PSCTF的实验数据的比较表明,仿真程序能够以一般良好的精度预测这些特性。这项工作的结果是积极的。随着生物量比例的增加,发现在PSCTF ud与草共烧时,NOx的排放量减少了13%至50%,CO2减少了12% udand 23%,SO2减少了21%至29%。从10%到20%。锯末的最大排放量减少了20%。这些分别是NOx的29%,CO2的17%和 udSO2的15%。 ud对于草基共烧,所用煤的燃烧效率提高了 ud%分别为15%和20%的0.55%和0.62%点火比;当混烧率从10% ud%增加到20%时,木屑粉的比例在0.78%至0.38%之间。 10%草的燃烧效率下降了0.65%。 DTF结果表明,在1000°C至1200°C的温度范围内,草屑和锯末均可提高煤的可燃性。由该范围的DTF结果确定的燃烧效率表明,草的燃烧效率提高了 ud0.1%至1.4%,锯末提高了0.8%至2.45%。 QEMSCAN 共烧生物质时对炉渣沉积物的分析表明,它们通常应该弱到足以被吹灰设备处理。 ud最后,草(草质)生物质导致的减排量更大/木屑(木屑)的排放量更大。还发现,排渣将不再是一个问题在使用草时,因为矿渣沉积物比锯末更易碎。 ud在较高的共烧比例下,草基共烧可改善煤的可燃性比用木屑可以做到的。与草的最佳混合燃烧比在能源基础上似乎将达到15%左右。 ud该项目旨在获得有关将生物质与煤粉混合燃烧的显着效果的基本技术信息。在执行任何实施之前,下一步将是使用完整的系统工程原理,对可能的大规模应用进行详细的技术和经济可行性研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pokothoane Palo Sidwell;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号