首页> 外文OA文献 >Social Systems of Innovation and Comparative Institutional Advantage : Institution Problems in the Systems of Innovation (II)
【2h】

Social Systems of Innovation and Comparative Institutional Advantage : Institution Problems in the Systems of Innovation (II)

机译:创新的社会制度与比较制度优势:创新制度中的制度问题(二)

摘要

The purpose of this article is to explore the relationship between the social systems of innovation and u27comparative institutional advantageu27, by examining the way political economists explain the correlation between institutional arrangements and sectoral systems of innovation. First, we shed some light on the contributions of the organizational and institutional approaches to innovation in the u27regulationu27 approach (B. Coriat and O. Weinstein). They clarify the double nature and dimension of institutions: u27rules of the gameu27 and u27tangible resourcesu27. Secondly, they emphasize three series of institutional arrangements related to radical or incremental innovation: intellectual property rights regimes, corporate governance and the financing of innovation, and the industrial relations and educational systems. Third, we find that they discuss both the u27complementaritiesu27 between three different institutions, and relative institutional advantages for industrial sector, and then they present the two u27ideal typeu27 models: POE model (patent/outsider control/external labor market) and OII model (u27open knowledgeu27/insider control/internal labor market). Moreover, they argue the sectoral relevance of such contrasting models. Finally, the u27Varieties of Capitalismu27 approach (S. Casper and D. Soskice) also explore the relationship between institutional frameworks and firmlevel strategies, and find out, based on case studies aiming at recent institutional changes, the opposite patterns of u27subsectoru27 specialization in Germany and the United Kingdom.
机译:本文的目的是通过研究政治经济学家解释制度安排与部门创新系统之间的关系的方式,探索创新的社会系统与“比较制度优势”之间的关系。首先,我们阐明了组织和制度方法对创新的贡献(B. Coriat和O. Weinstein)。它们阐明了制度的双重性质和规模:游戏规则和有形资源。其次,他们强调了与激进或渐进式创新相关的三大系列制度安排:知识产权制度,公司治理和创新筹资以及劳资关系和教育制度。第三,我们发现他们既讨论了三个不同机构之间的互补性,又讨论了工业部门的相对机构优势,然后他们提出了两种理想类型的模型:POE模型(专利/局外人控制/外部劳动力市场) )和OII模型(开放知识/内部控制/内部劳动力市场)。而且,他们争论了这种对比模型的部门相关性。最后,资本主义变迁方法(S. Casper和D. Soskice)还探讨了制度框架与企业战略之间的关系,并基于针对近期制度变迁的案例研究,发现了变迁的相反模式。 u27德国和英国的专业。

著录项

  • 作者

    安孫子 誠男; Abiko Shigeo;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 jpn
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-31 15:58:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号