首页> 外文OA文献 >Review of Georgina Born and David Hesmondhalgh, eds. Western Music and Its Others: Difference, Representation, and Appropriation in Music. University of California Press, 2000. xi, 360 pp.
【2h】

Review of Georgina Born and David Hesmondhalgh, eds. Western Music and Its Others: Difference, Representation, and Appropriation in Music. University of California Press, 2000. xi, 360 pp.

机译:《 Georgina Born和David Hesmondhalgh的评论》(合编)。西方音乐及其它音乐:音乐中的差异,表现形式和专有性。加利福尼亚大学出版社,2000年。xi,360页。

摘要

This is an important book, and deserves attention from ethnomusicologists, historical musicologists, and students of popular culture across the disciplines. It is the first collection I am aware of to situate issues of the politics, semiotics, and cultural dynamics of musical appropriation in a broad, interdisciplinary context attentive to the theoretical projects of postcolonial and post-structuralist cultural studies. There have been several monographic studies and edited volumes in recent years that have explored some of this intellectual terrain; Gerry Farrell's Indian Music and the West (1997) and Jonathan Bellman's edited collection The Exotic in Western Music (1998) each approach art musics in terms of transnational appropriations and Orientalist cultural dynamics. And a wide range of work on popular music and globalization has taken up the thorny problematic of "appropriation" in terms of issues of ownership and cultural imperialism (a good example is Timothy Taylor's 1997 Global Pop). However, the disciplinary and empirical articulations achieved in this volume are in many cases novel and, in their totality, quite progressive. Simply by virtue of its serious commitments to interweaving popular and art music subjects, "western" and "non-western" idioms and perspectives, and textual and contextual emphases, it sets a fine example for a more dialogic and less ghettoized future musicology. The volume is comprised of exceptionally strong papers from both very well known and younger scholars, and it is relatively coherent as a whole while covering a huge range of topics and issues.
机译:这是一本重要的书,值得民族音乐学家,历史音乐学家和各学科流行文化的学生关注。这是我所知道的第一个集合,它将音乐的政治,符号学和文化动态问题放在一个广泛的跨学科的背景下,关注后殖民和后结构主义文化研究的理论项目。近年来,有一些专着研究和编辑的著作探索了这种知识领域。格里·法瑞尔(Gerry Farrell)的《印度音乐与西方》(1997)和乔纳森·贝尔曼(Jonathan Bellman)编辑的作品《西方音乐的异国情调》(1998)都从跨国拨款和东方文化动态的角度来探讨艺术音乐。流行音乐和全球化方面的广泛工作解决了所有权和文化帝国主义等棘手的“盗用”问题(蒂莫西·泰勒(Timothy Taylor)的1997年全球流行音乐就是一个很好的例子)。然而,在许多情况下,在此书中获得的学科和经验方面的阐述都是新颖的,并且总体而言是相当进步的。仅仅由于其对交织流行音乐和艺术音乐主题,“西方”和“非西方”成语和观点以及文本和上下文重点的认真承诺,它为更多的对话和较少的贫民窟化的未来音乐学树立了典范。该卷由非常著名的和年轻的学者撰写的非常出色的论文组成,并且在涉及大量主题和问题的同时,整体上相对连贯。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fox Aaron Andrew;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2000
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号