首页> 外文OA文献 >Role of Institutions in Responding to the Syrian Refugees Crisis in Lebanon: The Humanitarian Aid Framework of Saida
【2h】

Role of Institutions in Responding to the Syrian Refugees Crisis in Lebanon: The Humanitarian Aid Framework of Saida

机译:机构在应对黎巴嫩叙利亚难民危机中的作用:萨伊达的人道主义援助框架

摘要

As of September 2014, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) estimated that millions of Syrian refugees have been displaced from their homes due to the ongoing Syrian civil war. Since the beginning of the uprising against the Syrian government in March 2011, Lebanon has become host to almost 1.2 million Syrian refugees. The lack of Lebanese policy, legislation and action toward managing their increasing influx has led to arbitrary and dispersed settlements in over 1730 different localities in Lebanon, residing mainly in lower income communities. The Syrian refugee crisis in Lebanon is entangled in a complex and continually shifting array of issues spanning from the humanitarian, socio-economic, political, and security circumstances of the Syrian refugees, to their impact on Lebanon's economy, social fabric, political stability, and national security. With the absence of a robust response by the Lebanese government to the crisis, this study focuses on the role of local, international, governmental, and non-governmental institutions in confronting the refugee influx, and managing the impact of their introduction to the Lebanese milieu. As a case study, this thesis considers the aid framework of the city of Saida, located in the South of Lebanon. Saida's framework represents a flexible, high-engagement modality for localized management of refugee inflows, featuring a coalition of local Islamic NGOs in close collaboration with the municipality. International organizations such as the UNHCR are also heavily involved in Saida's relief management. This case study describes the varying activity and impact of the principal actors of Saida's operating environment, and highlights the distinct roles of Western and Islamic aid organizations. Building upon phenomena revealed in the case study, this thesis presents an analytical framework delineating the principal variables affecting Saida's operating environment. These variables are Legislation, Economy, Public Services, Housing, General Security, Policing, Social Capital, and Transnational Aid. Each variable contains a particular set of dimensions, whose clear layout helps to illuminate interrelations between variables, as well as the challenges facing aid practitioners in Lebanon. This analytical framework further emphasizes the importance of the Transnational Aid variable to the stability and progress of the Syrian refugee circumstance, inspiring further investigation into current transnational aid modalities. The Humanitarian Aid Models section presents and analyzes the structure, operations, financing, political interests, and ideologies of the two main humanitarian models involved in the refugee crisis in Saida: the Secular Western Aid Model, and the Faith-Based Islamic Aid Model. Empowered by the Operating Environment Variables framework and the Humanitarian Aid Models analysis, this study makes dimension-level recommendations to the principal actors impacting Saida's operating environment. Yet this thesis goes beyond merely offering recommendations for the stability and advancement of the current aid paradigm, which is centered on providing refugees with basic amenities and rights. This study elucidates the possibility of a positive-sum refugee management paradigm, predicated upon the idea that a well-managed integration of Syrian refugees potentiates a cosmopolitan socioeconomic environment. Through education, training, microfinance schemes, and other economic encouragements, Syrian refugees could be integrated into dynamic economic frameworks on the local and national level. This paradigm redefines 'social justice' as the appreciation and liberalization of the human capacity for innovation and discourse, arguing that Syrian refugees - and certainly others - stand to contribute significantly to the socioeconomic capital of host communities. Moreover, cross-cultural discourse could broaden eclecticism and generate unique synergies, enhancing the general quality of life in host environments.
机译:截至2014年9月,联合国难民事务高级专员(难民署)估计,由于叙利亚持续进行内战,数百万叙利亚难民被迫流离失所。自2011年3月发动针对叙利亚政府的起义以来,黎巴嫩已接待了将近120万叙利亚难民。黎巴嫩缺乏管理不断增加的人口的政策,立法和行动,导致黎巴嫩1730多个不同地区的定居和分散定居,主要居住在低收入社区。黎巴嫩的叙利亚难民危机卷入了一系列复杂且不断变化的问题,从叙利亚难民的人道主义,社会经济,政治和安全状况,到对黎巴嫩经济,社会结构,政治稳定和国家安全。由于黎巴嫩政府没有对危机作出有力的回应,因此本研究着重于地方,国际,政府和非政府机构在应对难民潮以及管理将其引入黎巴嫩环境方面的影响方面的作用。 。作为案例研究,本文考虑了位于黎巴嫩南部的赛达市的援助框架。 Saida的框架代表了一种灵活的,高度参与的方式,用于对难民流入进行本地化管理,其特色是由当地伊斯兰非政府组织与市政当局密切合作组成的联盟。诸如难民署之类的国际组织也大量参与了萨伊达的救济管理。此案例研究描述了Saida运营环境的主要参与者的活动变化和影响,并重点介绍了西方和伊斯兰援助组织的独特作用。在案例研究中揭示的现象的基础上,本文提出了一个分析框架,该框架描述了影响Saida操作环境的主要变量。这些变量是立法,经济,公共服务,住房,一般安全,警务,社会资本和跨国援助。每个变量都包含一组特定的维度,其清晰的布局有助于阐明变量之间的相互关系,以及黎巴嫩援助从业人员面临的挑战。该分析框架进一步强调了跨国援助变量对叙利亚难民情况的稳定和进步的重要性,激发了对当前跨国援助方式的进一步研究。 “人道主义援助模型”部分介绍并分析了赛达难民危机中涉及的两个主要人道主义模型的结构,运作,融资,政治利益和意识形态:世俗西方援助模型和基于信仰的伊斯兰援助模型。在操作环境变量框架和人道主义援助模型分析的支持下,本研究向影响saida的操作环境的主要参与者提出了维度级别的建议。然而,本论文不仅仅为当前援助范式的稳定性和发展提供建议,其重点在于为难民提供基本的便利和权利。这项研究阐明了采用积极和合的难民管理范式的可能性,其前提是,对叙利亚难民进行妥善管理的融合可以增强国际化的社会经济环境。通过教育,培训,小额信贷计划和其他经济鼓励措施,可以将叙利亚难民纳入地方和国家一级充满活力的经济框架。这种范式将“社会正义”重新定义为对人类创新和话语能力的欣赏和自由化,认为叙利亚难民,当然还有其他难民,将为收容社区的社会经济资本做出重大贡献。此外,跨文化话语可以扩大折衷主义并产生独特的协同作用,从而提高东道国环境的总体生活质量。

著录项

  • 作者

    El Hariri Ola;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号