首页> 外文OA文献 >Fertilizer markets and their interplay with commodity and food prices
【2h】

Fertilizer markets and their interplay with commodity and food prices

机译:化肥市场及其与商品和食品价格的相互作用

摘要

This study analyses the drivers behind the recent price evolution of fertilizers and their interplay with energy and food commodity market prices. First, evidence of speculative behaviour on fertilizer markets is found. However, speculation on derivative markets can hardly be considered as the cause. The recent rapid expansion of this new derivative market might be due to the growing volatility of international fertilizer prices, especially urea, and it is probable that most of the fertilizer derivative products may be used as hedging tools and not as speculative ones. Indeed, the peak in fertilizer prices first occurred on the physical market due to the uncertainty of the grain and fertilizer markets (high volatility). Second, the prices of food commodities have influenced the fertilizer market and not vice versa. The results show that there is substantial co-movement between fertilizers' and food prices, but that the food prices are among the causes of the fertilizer price movements. Higher food prices induced a higher demand for fertilizers, again boosting prices to higher levels. Third, the energy sector triggered the increase in fertilizer prices through the input cost channel. Energy represents a key input in the production of fertilizers. Rising oil and natural gas prices provoked a spark for the nitrogen nutrients whose production depends heavily on energy inputs for production and transport. The same occurred to phosphate and potash, where energy input is less important in their respective production cost structures. Fourth, given the oligopolistic fertilizer supply chain and the inelasticity of the supply of fertilizers (there is a 5 to 10 year delay before new production plants can be put into the supply chain), this created an upward adjustment of the expectations in the fertilizer market causing an upward spiral effect of the price. This eventually might have provoked a price peak in 2007 due to the uncertainty surrounding the low levels of global fertilizer stocks (nitrogen and phosphate). Over the previous 15 years, the excess nitrogen supply has nearly vanished while phosphate and potash have remained at marginal levels, meaning that no buffer could protect the market when an adverse shock occurred in 2007. Fifth, the volatility of energy, food and fertilizer prices move closely together in an environment of rising energy prices. In the opposite scenario, food and fertilizer volatility do not move together with the volatility of energy prices in an environment of decreasing energy prices. Consistent with other studies, the volatility of fertilizer, energy and food prices was lower during the commodity price peak of 2007/08 than during the 1973/74 oil price shock
机译:这项研究分析了近期肥料价格演变的动因及其与能源和食品商品市场价格的相互作用。首先,找到了肥料市场投机行为的证据。但是,很难将衍生品市场上的投机视为原因。新的衍生产品市场最近的快速扩张可能是由于国际化肥价格(尤其是尿素)价格波动加剧,而且很可能大多数化肥衍生产品都可以用作对冲工具,而不是投机工具。实际上,由于谷物和化肥市场的不确定性(高波动性),化肥价格的峰值首先出现在有形市场上。其次,食品价格影响了肥料市场,反之亦然。结果表明,肥料价格与食品价格之间存在很大的共同运动,但食品价格是肥料价格变动的原因之一。食品价格上涨导致对肥料的需求增加,再次将价格推高。第三,能源部门通过投入成本渠道触发了化肥价格上涨。能源是肥料生产中的关键投入。石油和天然气价格上涨激起了氮素养分的火花,其养分在很大程度上取决于生产和运输的能源投入。磷酸盐和钾肥也是如此,在它们各自的生产成本结构中,能量输入的重要性不高。第四,考虑到寡聚肥料供应链和肥料供应的无弹性(将新的生产工厂投入供应链需要延迟5至10年),这导致了肥料市场预期的向上调整导致价格上升的螺旋效应。由于围绕全球肥料库存(氮和磷酸盐)水平较低的不确定性,这最终可能在2007年引起了价格高峰。在过去的15年中,氮的过量供应几乎消失了,而磷酸盐和钾肥则保持在边际水平,这意味着当2007年发生不利冲击时,没有缓冲措施可以保护市场。第五,能源,食品和肥料价格的波动在能源价格上涨的环境中紧密合作。在相反的情况下,在能源价格下降的环境中,粮食和肥料的波动不会与能源价格的波动一起移动。与其他研究一致,在2007/08年商品价格高峰期间,化肥,能源和食品价格的波动性低于1973/74年石油价格冲击期间的波动性

著录项

  • 作者

    OTT HERVE;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 ENG
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号