首页> 外文OA文献 >Randomised clinical trial: mesalazine and/or probiotics in maintaining remission of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease - a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study
【2h】

Randomised clinical trial: mesalazine and/or probiotics in maintaining remission of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease - a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study

机译:随机临床试验:美沙拉嗪和/或益生菌维持症状缓解的复杂性憩室病的缓解-一项双盲,随机,安慰剂对照研究

摘要

BACKGROUND: Placebo-controlled studies in maintaining remission of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) of the colon are lacking. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of mesalazine and/or probiotics in maintaining remission in SUDD. METHODS: A multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted. Two hundred and ten patients were randomly enrolled in a double-blind fashion in four groups: Group M (active mesalazine 1.6 g/day plus Lactobacillus casei subsp. DG placebo), Group L (active Lactobacillus casei subsp. DG 24 billion/day plus mesalazine placebo), Group LM (active Lactobacillus casei subsp. DG 24 billion/day plus active mesalazine), Group P (Lactobacillus casei subsp. DG placebo plus mesalazine placebo). Patients received treatment for 10 days/month for 12 months. Recurrence of SUDD was defined as the reappearance of abdominal pain during follow-up, scored as >/=5 (0: best; 10: worst) for at least 24 consecutive hours. RESULTS: Recurrence of SUDD occurred in no (0%) patient in group LM, in 7 (13.7%) patients in group M, in 8 (14.5%) patients in group L and in 23 (46.0%) patients in group P (LM group vs. M group, P = 0.015; LM group vs. L group, P = 0.011; LM group vs. P group, P = 0.000; M group vs. P group, P = 0.000; L group vs. P group, P = 0.000). Acute diverticulitis occurred in six group P cases and in one group L case (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Both cyclic mesalazine and Lactobacillus casei subsp. DG treatments, particularly when given in combination, appear to be better than placebo for maintaining remission of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01534754).
机译:背景:缺乏维持结肠症状性单纯性憩室病(SUDD)缓解的安慰剂对照研究。目的:评估美沙拉嗪和/或益生菌维持SUDD缓解的有效性。方法:进行了多中心,双盲,安慰剂对照研究。 210名患者以双盲方式随机分为四组:M组(活性美沙拉嗪1.6克/天,加上干酪乳杆菌DG安慰剂),L组(活性干酪乳杆菌DG每天240亿颗,加上)美沙拉嗪安慰剂),LM组(活跃的干酪乳杆菌DG子集240亿/天,加上活性美沙拉嗪),P组(干酪乳杆菌DG安慰剂亚种,美沙拉嗪安慰剂)。患者接受为期10个月/月的治疗,共12个月。 SUDD复发定义为随访期间再次出现腹痛,至少连续24小时评分为> / = 5(0:最佳; 10:最差)。结果:LM组无(0%)患者,M组有7(13.7%)患者,L组有8(14.5%)患者和P组有23(46.0%)患者发生SUDD复发( LM组vs.M组,P = 0.015; LM组vs.L组,P = 0.011; LM组vs.P组,P = 0.000; M组vs.P组,P = 0.000; L组vs.P组,P = 0.000)。急性憩室炎发生在P组6例和L组1例中(P = 0.003)。结论:环状美沙拉嗪和干酪乳杆菌亚种。 DG疗法,尤其是组合使用时,在保持症状简单的憩室病的缓解方面似乎优于安慰剂。 (ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01534754)。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号