首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparative study of point-to-point algorithms for matching spectra
【2h】

A comparative study of point-to-point algorithms for matching spectra

机译:点对点匹配光谱算法的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Matching spectra is necessary for database searches, assessing the source of an unknown sample, structure elucidation, and classification of spectra. A direct method of matching is to compare, point by point, two digitized spectra, the outcome being a parameter that quantifies the degree of similarity or dissimilarity between the spectra. Examples studied here are correlation coefficient squared and Euclidean cosine squared, both applied to the raw spectra and first-difference values of absorbance. It is shown that spectra do not fulfill the requirements for a normal statistical interpretation of the correlation coefficient; in particular, they are not normally distributed variables. It is therefore not correct to use a Student`s t-test to calculate the probability of the null hypothesis that two spectra are not correlated on the basis of a correlation coefficient between them. We have investigated the effect on the similarity indices of systematically changing the mean and standard deviation of a single Gaussian peak relative to a reference Gaussian peak, of changing one peak, and of changing many peaks, in a simulated 10-peak spectrum. Squared Euclidean cosine is least sensitive to changes and the first-difference methods are most sensitive to changes in mean and standard deviation of peaks. A shift of the center of a peak has a greater effect on the indices than increases in peak width, but a decrease in peak width does lead to significant changes in the indices. We recommend that if these indices are to be used to match spectra, appropriate windows should be chosen to avoid dilution by regions with no significant change. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:匹配光谱对于数据库搜索,评估未知样品的来源,结构阐明和光谱分类是必不可少的。一种直接匹配的方法是逐点比较两个数字化的光谱,结果是量化光谱之间相似度或不相似度的参数。此处研究的示例是相关系数平方和欧几里德余弦平方,均应用于原始光谱和吸光度的一阶差分值。结果表明,光谱不满足相关系数的正常统计解释的要求;特别是它们不是正态分布的变量。因此,使用学生的t检验来计算零假设的可能性是不正确的,该零假设是基于两个光谱之间的相关系数而使两个光谱不相关。我们已经研究了在相似的10峰频谱中,系统地改变单个高斯峰相对于参考高斯峰的均值和标准偏差,改变一个峰以及改变许多峰对相似性指标的影响。平方欧几里德余弦对变化最不敏感,而一阶差分法对峰的均值和标准偏差的变化最敏感。峰中心的移动对指标的影响大于峰宽的增加,但是峰宽的减小的确会导致指标的显着变化。我们建议,如果将这些指数用于匹配光谱,则应选择适当的窗口,以避免被没有明显变化的区域稀释。 (c)2005 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号