首页> 外文OA文献 >Crimes of exclusion: the Australian state’s responses to unauthorised migrants.
【2h】

Crimes of exclusion: the Australian state’s responses to unauthorised migrants.

机译:排斥犯罪:澳大利亚州对未经授权的移民的反应。

摘要

This thesis provides a criminological perspective on the Australian state’s responses to unauthorised migrants. In particular, it attempts to build on recent criminological literature on state crime by contrasting the alleged deviance of unauthorised migrants with the organised and deviant human rights abuses perpetrated by the Australian state.The main argument of the thesis is that through the systematic alienation, criminalisation and abuse of unauthorised migrants, particularly refugees, the Australian state is engaged in state crime. While this can partly be measured bybreaches of international humanitarian law, the acts in question are criminal according to the broader sociological understanding of state crime as ‘state organisational deviance involving the violation of human rights’.The thesis develops this argument by locating the phenomena of forced and illicit migration within an increasingly globalised world economy in which the needs for international human migration are confronted by the restrictive migration policies of the dominant Western states. In this context, the Australian state has played a pivotal role in the development of three major Western exclusion zones, which are designed to contain unauthorised migrants in the developing world and are enforced by measures that systematically abuse human rights.The fundamental criminological dynamic of the Australian exclusion zone is its systematic assault on the movements and by definition, the rights, of forced migrants.This operates at a number of levels: unauthorised arrivals are alienated by their lack of legal status; they are denied access to a full refugee determination process; their status as refugees is subordinated to that of the resettled refugee; their experiences are denied and delegitimised through their construction as queue jumpers; they are criminalised through their participation in smuggling enterprises; they are punished and abused through the use of detention, dispersal and forced removal; and they are put at greater personal risk by the measures employed to enforce the zone.The thesis traces the development of this zone from the formation of the white Australia policy through to the Pacific Solution and critically analyses the ways in which current policy draws on and reinforces the exclusionist traditions of Australian nationalism.
机译:本文为澳大利亚州对未授权移民的反应提供了犯罪学视角。尤其是,它试图通过将近来关于国家犯罪的犯罪学文献建立基础,将所谓的未经授权移民的背离与澳大利亚国家所犯下的有组织和不正当的侵犯人权行为进行对比。以及滥用未经授权的移民,特别是难民,澳大利亚州正在犯罪。虽然这可以部分地通过违反国际人道主义法来衡量,但根据对国家犯罪作为“涉及人权侵犯的国家组织偏差”的更广泛的社会学理解,所涉行为是犯罪的。在日益全球化的世界经济中的强迫和非法移民,在这个国际经济中,主要的西方国家的限制性移民政策面临着国际人类移民的需求。在这种情况下,澳大利亚州在三个主要的西部禁区的发展中发挥了关键作用,这些禁区旨在遏制发展中世界的未授权移民,并通过有计划地滥用人权的措施加以实施。澳大利亚的禁区是它对强迫移民的迁徙和权利的系统攻击,它在多个层面上起作用:未经授权的到来由于缺乏法律地位而被疏远;他们被剥夺了进入完整的难民确定程序的机会;他们的难民地位服从于已安置的难民;通过组队跳线,他们的经历被否认和被剥夺了合法性;通过参与走私企业被定为刑事犯罪;他们通过拘留,驱散和强迫遣散受到惩罚和虐待;论文追溯了该区域从白澳大利亚政策形成到太平洋解决方案的发展,并严格分析了当前政策的运用方式和实施方式,从而给该区域带来更大的个人风险。强化了澳大利亚民族主义的排外主义传统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号