首页> 外文OA文献 >Remembering polishness: articulating and maintaining identity through turbulent times
【2h】

Remembering polishness: articulating and maintaining identity through turbulent times

机译:记住抛光度:在动荡的时刻表达和维护身份

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This thesis details the maintenance of Polish identities through acts of memory: the (re)production, transmission and reception of Polish cultural practices. The (re)productions and transmissions of Polish identity formations, and the acts of remembrance, are multifarious by nature, and I have examined them in two distinctly different settings – in public spheres in Poland, and in the private realms of Australian Polish diaspora. In this thesis, these research settings have been conceptualised as the conduits through which Polish identities are maintained. Polish identity is theorised using a constructivist approach; Polish identities are therefore positioned historically and geographically. Their performances are fluid: they move through time and across spaces.The active maintenance of Polish identity developed as a result of foreign occupations. The partitioning of Poland by the Austro-Hungarian, Prussian and Russian Empires lasted 123 years. From 1795 to 1918 the Polish nation was expunged. Following a brief period of independence between World War I (WWI) and World War II (WWII), Poland was again occupied by Nazi and Soviet regimes during WWII (1939-1945). The Soviet occupation continued after WWII with the Soviet-supported Polish government that lasted until 1989. Under occupation – particularly during WWII – Poland suffered events that have been indelibly imprinted within Polish cultural memory. The macabre nature of this era included the incursion of hegemonic regimes on political and everyday social life, as well as the atrocities for which it is well known. An important outcome of these occupations has been the division of discourses of Polishness, and their remembrances, into distinctly public and private spheres.These periods of foreign occupation brought various attempts to suppress and eliminate Polishness: the cultures and identifications of Polish people. Suppression particularly occurred in public spheres through the prohibition of the Polish language, and by investing the public memory landscape with ideologies that represented the new regimes. By repressing public commemorations of Polish cultural narratives, a new history was written at the expense of the Polish experience. There have been two primary responses to these repressions of Polishness. These responses initially developed during the partitioned period to ensure that Polish language and cultural practices were maintained. First, a narrative and tradition of resistance emerged in reaction to the Russian, Prussian and Austrian partitions. It was enacted through military participation in insurrections and through the production of patriotic Romantic Era cultural artefacts, both of which strengthened linkages to the Polish Catholic faith. Second, Polish cultural practices and language were safeguarded in the private spheres of home. It was in private settings, in Poland and within the diaspora in Australia, that memories and experiences of occupation were passed on and through generations. In Poland, such narratives were often maintained in resistance to those imposed by foreign occupiers and because of the inability to commemorate events of Poland’s macabre past in public. In Australia, identity maintenance has occurred to resist the dissolution of Polishness in a diasporic and multicultural environment.This thesis demonstrates the utility of studying cultural memories as a means of understanding how identity maintenance can occur in the face of adversities, such as the multiple foreign occupations that occurred in Poland, and in diaspora. Moreover, it exemplifies the diverse paths of identity maintenance in different contexts. This thesis shows that despite the distinctive character of both Polish public and private spheres, Polish identities have been informed, shaped and maintained through culturally-enacted memory (re)production. This process is exhibited in the present – in Poland and through the diaspora – and it occurred despite the repressive aims of various foreign occupiers.
机译:本文详细介绍了通过记忆行为维护波兰身份的过程:波兰文化习俗的(再)生产,传播和接受。波兰身份结构的(再)生产和传播,以及纪念行为,在本质上是多种多样的,我已经在两种截然不同的环境中对它们进行了研究-在波兰的公共领域以及在澳大利亚波兰侨民的私人领域。在本文中,这些研究背景已被概念化为维护波兰身份的渠道。使用建构主义的方法对波兰的身份进行理论化;因此,波兰的身份在历史和地理上都定位。他们的表演是变化无常的:它们在时间和空间之间移动。由于外国占领,波兰人的身份得到积极维护。奥匈帝国,普鲁士帝国和俄罗斯帝国对波兰的划分持续了123年。从1795年到1918年,波兰民族被废除。在第一次世界大战(WWI)和第二次世界大战(WWII)之间短暂的独立之后,波兰在第二次世界大战(1939-1945)期间再次被纳粹和苏联政权占领。第二次世界大战后,苏联占领持续到1989年,直到苏联支持的波兰政府为止。在占领下-特别是第二次世界大战期间-波兰发生了被波兰文化记忆深刻地铭刻的事件。这个时代的骇人听闻的性质包括霸权政权侵害政治和日常社会生活,以及众所周知的暴行。这些职业的重要成果是将波兰语的话语及其记忆分为明显的公共和私人领域。这些外国占领时期带来了各种压制和消灭波兰语的尝试:波兰人的文化和认同。压制特别是通过禁止波兰语在公共领域发生,并通过用代表新政权的意识形态来投资公共记忆领域。通过压抑对波兰文化叙事的公开纪念,以牺牲波兰经验为代价,写下了新的历史。对波兰性的这些镇压有两个主要反应。这些响应最初是在分区期间制定的,以确保维持波兰的语言和文化习俗。首先,对俄罗斯,普鲁士和奥地利的划分产生了反抗的叙事和传统。它是通过军事参与叛乱和生产爱国浪漫主义时期的文化文物而制定的,两者均加强了与波兰天主教信仰的联系。第二,波兰的文化习俗和语言在家庭的私人领域得到了保障。在私人环境中,在波兰以及在澳大利亚的海外侨民中,职业的记忆和经历传承了几代人。在波兰,此类叙事常常被用来抵制外国占领者施加的叙事,并且由于无法纪念波兰在公共场合发生的令人震惊的事件。在澳大利亚,身份维护在抵制波兰文化在多元文化和多元文化环境中的瓦解中发挥了作用。本论文证明了研究文化记忆的实用性,可作为一种理解在面对多种逆境时如何进行身份维护的方法。在波兰和海外散居的职业。而且,它举例说明了在不同上下文中身份维护的不同路径。这篇论文表明,尽管波兰公共和私人领域都具有鲜明的特征,但波兰的身份是通过文化定义的记忆(再生产)进行告知,塑造和维护的。目前,这个过程在波兰和海外侨民中都得到了展示,尽管各种外国占领者的镇压目标仍然存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号