首页> 外文OA文献 >The relative contribution of psychological, social, and environmental variables to explain variation in leisure-time physical activity among adults at a population level
【2h】

The relative contribution of psychological, social, and environmental variables to explain variation in leisure-time physical activity among adults at a population level

机译:心理,社会和环境变量的相对贡献可解释人口水平上成年人休闲时间体育活动的变化

摘要

Background Information: There is substantial evidence demonstrating the significant benefits of regular physical activity (PA) and the burden of morbidity and mortality associated with inactivity. In Australia however, approximately 40% of the adult population is not meeting recommended levels of PA, the rates of inactivity may be increasing, and improving population levels of PA has been identified as a public health priority. Research is needed therefore, to develop a better understanding of the variables that limit and facilitate PA levels within the population, so as to guide the development of population-based PA promotion. Although a range of psychological, social and environmental variables have been associated with PA, few studies have integrated correlates across these domains and compared their relative contribution. The current evidence base is also limited by too few population-based studies, insufficient assessment of the measurement properties of correlate scales, minimal information on PA item non-response, and a lack of specificity among PA domains. Aims: This research program aimed to develop measures and examine the relative contributions of self-reported psychological, social, and environmental variables to explain variation in leisure-time PA (LTPA) among adults in the general population. Methods: This research program comprised three studies that utilised a crosssectional design and a mail survey methodology with a population-based random sample drawn from Brisbane, Australia (N=5000). Study one involved development and assessment of the measurement properties of a battery of scales to measure correlates of LTPA, using principal components and internal reliability analyses. Study two assessed the magnitude of and sociodemographic variables associated with LTPA item non-response on the mail survey, using logistic regression. Study three examined the independent contributions of self-reported psychological, social, and environmental variables to variation in walking, moderate- and vigorousintensity LTPA, using logistic regression adjusted for sociodemographic covariates. Results: Study one produced a battery of 28 scales to assess self-reported psychological, social and environmental correlates of LTPA. The scales used a total of 123 items to measure activity history (habit, mastery, exposure), health (physical, psychological), activity-related cognitions (self schemata, activity schemata, demand, need, knowledge), self-efficacy, anticipated benefits (psychological, health, challenge, improved appearance, social, weight management), perceived barriers (expense/low access, poor skill, poor personal functioning, time organization, disinterest, family obligations), social support (encouragement, discouragement) and neighborhood environment (available facilities, physical characteristics, aesthetic features, traffic). Of the 28 scales that were factorially derived, 25 had acceptable or marginal levels of internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.65 to 0.89. Study two indicated that 28% of the mail survey respondents had incomplete LTPA data with 8% of respondents missing the walking item, and 18% and 23% missing the vigorous-intensity and moderate-intensity LTPA items respectively. Respondents who missed all three LTPA items were more likely than those with complete LTPA data to be female, less educated, from low-income households, in poor health, and a current smoker. Respondents who missed the walking item were significantly more likely to be a current smoker, and to have limited education and low household income. Incomplete moderate-intensity LTPA data was associated with single parenthood and vocational education. Those who missed the vigorousintensity LTPA item were more likely to be 35-54 years old, in fair or poor health, and obese. Respondents with incomplete LTPA data were also more likely to miss sociodemographic items assessing education, household composition, and household income. In study three, the sociodemographic and correlate variables collectively accounted for 43% of the variation in total LTPA, 45% of vigorous-intensity LTPA, 26%of walking, and 22% of moderate-intensity LTPA (Nagelkerke R square). The individual correlates accounted for 0.0 - 4.0% of unique variation across the different domains of LTPA. Habit, self-efficacy, and social encouragement tended to contribute more unique variation for each LTPA domain. Physical health, discouragement, competition, and time management barriers contributed more unique variation to vigorous-intensity LTPA. Anticipated benefits of social interactions and weight management contributed more unique variation to moderate-intensity LTPA. Neighbourhood aesthetics contributed more unique variation to walking variation. Conclusions. This research program demonstrates the importance of integrating psychological, social, and environmental variables to explain PA, and that the relative importance of these correlates is likely to differ among PA domains. More research is needed to enhance the conceptualisation and measurement of correlate variables, in particular PA opportunities across the lifecourse, the anticipated benefit of a balanced lifestyle, the barriers of an unpredictable lifestyle and family obligations, social discouragement, and environmental variables. Population-based mail surveys of LTPA may under-represent population subgroups that are insufficiently active for health, and proactive strategies are needed to maximise their full participation in research and obtain complete survey data, in particular among individuals of low socioeconomic position and for the assessment of moderateintensity LTPA. Generic promotion to increase overall levels of LTPA in the population could focus on promoting self-efficacy for PA and habitual LTPA, as well as enhancing social encouragement. Tailored promotion for vigorous-intensity LTPA could reduce barriers associated with physical health, discouragement, competitiveness, and time management. Tailored promotion for moderate-intensity LTPA and walking should focus on supportive local neighbourhoods and promote the benefits of weight management and social interactions. In time, the successful implementation of such policy and promotion may arrest the decline of PA levels in the population, reduce preventable morbidity and mortality and economic burden associated with inactivity, and facilitate improved health for all Australians.
机译:背景信息:有大量证据表明,定期进行体育锻炼(PA)具有明显的好处,以及与缺乏运动有关的发病和死亡负担。但是,在澳大利亚,大约40%的成年人口未达到建议的PA水平,不活动的比率可能正在增加,提高PA水平已被确定为公共卫生工作的重点。因此,需要进行研究,以更好地理解限制和促进人群中PA水平的变量,从而指导基于人群的PA促进的发展。尽管心理,社会和环境变量与PA有关,但很少有研究对这些领域的相关因素进行综合并比较其相对贡献。当前的证据基础还受到以下限制:基于人群的研究太少,对相关量表的测量属性的评估不足,关于PA项目无应答的信息最少以及PA域之间缺乏特异性。目的:该研究计划旨在制定措施并检查自我报告的心理,社会和环境变量的相对贡献,以解释普通人群中成年人休闲时间PA(LTPA)的变化。方法:该研究计划包括三项研究,这些研究利用横断面设计和邮件调查方法,并从澳大利亚布里斯班抽取人口为基础的随机样本(N = 5000)。研究之一涉及使用主要成分和内部可靠性分析来开发和评估一系列用来测量LTPA相关性的秤的测量特性。研究二使用逻辑回归分析评估了邮件调查中与LTPA项目无反应相关的数量级和社会人口统计学变量。研究三使用针对社会人口统计学协变量调整的逻辑回归,检验了自我报告的心理,社会和环境变量对步行,中度和剧烈强度LTPA变化的独立贡献。结果:研究人员制作了28个量表,以评估自我报告的LTPA的心理,社会和环境相关性。量表共使用123个项目来衡量活动历史(习惯,掌握,接触),健康(身体,心理),与活动有关的认知(自我图式,活动图式,需求,需求,知识),自我效能感,预期福利(心理,健康,挑战,改善的容貌,社交,体重管理),感知障碍(费用/低获取,技能低下,个人功能差,时间安排,无聊,家庭义务),社会支持(鼓励,灰心)和社区环境(可用的设施,物理特征,美学特征,交通)。在因式分解得出的28个量表中,有25个的内部一致性水平处于可接受或较低的水平,克朗巴赫的alpha值介于0.65至0.89之间。研究二表明,有28%的邮件调查受访者具有不完整的LTPA数据,其中8%的受访者缺少步行项目,而有18%和23%的受访者缺少强度和中等强度的LTPA项目。与没有完整的LTPA数据的人相比,错过了所有LTPA的三项调查对象的女性更有可能是女性,受教育程度较低,来自低收入家庭,健康状况不佳以及目前吸烟的人。错过步行用品的受访者更有可能是目前吸烟者,受教育程度有限,家庭收入较低。中等强度的LTPA数据不完整与单身父母和职业教育有关。那些错过了强度很强的LTPA项目的人更可能是35-54岁,健康状况良好或较差,并且肥胖。 LTPA数据不完整的受访者也更有可能错过评估教育,家庭组成和家庭收入的社会人口统计项目。在研究三中,社会人口学和相关变量共同占总LTPA变化的43%,剧烈强度LTPA的45%,行走的26%和中等强度LTPA的22%(Nagelkerke R平方)。各个相关因素占LTPA不同域中唯一变异的0.0-4.0%。习惯,自我效能感和社会鼓励往往会为每个LTPA域带来更多独特的变化。身体健康,沮丧,竞争和时间管理壁垒对剧烈强度的LTPA造成了更多独特的变化。社交互动和体重管理的预期收益为中等强度的LTPA带来了更多独特的变化。邻里美学为步行变化贡献了更多独特的变化。结论。该研究计划证明了整合心理,社会和环境变量来解释PA的重要性,并且这些关联的相对重要性在PA域之间可能有所不同。需要进行更多的研究来增强相关变量的概念化和度量,特别是整个生命过程中的PA机会,平衡的生活方式的预期收益,不可预测的生活方式和家庭义务的障碍,社会灰心和环境变量。 LTPA的基于人群的邮件调查可能不足以代表对健康不够活跃的人群,因此需要采取积极主动的策略以最大程度地充分参与研究并获得完整的调查数据,特别是在社会经济地位低下的人群以及进行评估的人群中等强度的LTPA。普遍提高人群中LTPA总体水平的促进措施可以集中于提高PA和习惯性LTPA的自我效能,以及增强社会鼓励。有针对性地大力推广LTPA可以减少与身体健康,沮丧,竞争力和时间管理相关的障碍。针对中等强度的LTPA和步行进行量身定制的推广应重点关注当地的支持社区,并推广体重管理和社交互动的好处。随着时间的推移,成功实施此类政策和促进措施可以制止人口中PA水平的下降,减少可预防的发病率和死亡率以及与不活动有关的经济负担,并促进所有澳大利亚人的健康改善。

著录项

  • 作者

    Burton Nicola Winship;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号