首页> 外文OA文献 >Domestic violence perpetrator programmes : what counts as success ?
【2h】

Domestic violence perpetrator programmes : what counts as success ?

机译:家庭暴力行为者计划:什么才算成功?

摘要

Whether domestic violence perpetratorudprogrammes ‘work’ is contested byudresearchers, policy makers and practitioners.udSome evaluations have concluded they doudreduce violence, whereas others claim theyuddo not and may even make things worse.udMuch of the disagreement is related to threeudissues: variations in methodological andudanalytical approaches; disagreements over theudinterpretation of data; and differing definitionsudof what the term ‘works’ means.udWhilst there is now extensiveudliterature exploring theudmethodological questions, ratherudless attention has been paid toudunpicking the latter issue. It is thisudtopic that we address in thisudbriefing note. What does it meanudfor a programme to ‘work’, to ‘beudsuccessful’, to have ‘positiveudoutcomes’, and whose perspectivesudon these questions should we beudmindful of ?
机译:ud研究人员,政策制定者和从业人员是否对家庭暴力肇事者 udprograms的“工作”提出质疑。 ud有些评估得出的结论是,他们确实减少了暴力行为,而另一些评估声称他们 udd不会这样做,甚至可能使情况变得更糟。 ud多数分歧与三个问题有关:方法论和分析方法的变化;关于数据的 ud解释的分歧; ud对“作品”一词的含义有不同的定义。 ud尽管现在已经有广泛的 ud文学研究了 udmethodologic问题,但是 udless的关注已经 udunpicing后一个问题。我们在本摘要说明中解决的就是这个主题。程序“工作”,“成功”,“成功”,“积极”是什么意思?对于这些问题,我们应该以谁的观点来理解?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号