首页> 外文OA文献 >The cultural grammar of governance: The UK Code of Corporate Governance, reflexivity, and the limits of 'soft' regulation
【2h】

The cultural grammar of governance: The UK Code of Corporate Governance, reflexivity, and the limits of 'soft' regulation

机译:治理的文化语法:《英国公司治理守则》,《反身性》和“软”监管的局限性

摘要

We identify limits of ‘reflexive governance’ by examining the UK Code of Corporate Governance that is celebrated for its ‘reflexivity’. By placing the historical genesis of the Code within its politico-economic context, it is shown how its scope and penetration is impeded by a shallow, ‘single loop’ of reflexivity. Legitimized by agency theory, the Code is infused by a ‘cultural grammar’ that perpetuates relations of shareholder primacy as it restricts accountability to narrow forms of information disclosure directed exclusively at shareholders. Engagement of a deeper, ‘double loop’ reflexivity allows account to be taken of the historical conditions and theoretical conceptions that shape practices and outcomes of corporate governance. Only then is it possible to disclose, challenge and reform narrow conceptions, boundaries and workings of ‘reflexive governance’.
机译:我们通过研究以“反思性”而著称的英国《公司治理守则》,来确定“反思性治理”的局限性。通过将《守则》的历史起源置于其政治经济背景下,可以看出该守则的范围和渗透是如何受到反射性的浅层“单一循环”的阻碍的。该规范是通过代理理论合法化的,并由一种“文化语法”注入,这种文化语法使股东至上的关系永存,因为它将问责制限制为仅针对股东的狭义信息披露形式。参与更深层次的“双循环”反射,可以考虑塑造公司治理实践和成果的历史条件和理论观念。只有这样,才有可能披露,挑战和改革“反身治理”的狭义概念,界限和运作方式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Veldman J.; Willmott H.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号