首页> 外文OA文献 >Détermination du sexe par la méthode itérative et le dimorphisme sexuel du squelette post-cranien d'une population du Chalcolithique récent et du Bronze ancien de la Bohème
【2h】

Détermination du sexe par la méthode itérative et le dimorphisme sexuel du squelette post-cranien d'une population du Chalcolithique récent et du Bronze ancien de la Bohème

机译:通过迭代方法确定性别,以及最近的波希米亚石器时代和古代青铜器人群的颅后骨骼的性别二态性

摘要

Iterative method of sex determination and sex dimorphism of post-cranial skeletal remains from late eneolithic and bronze age population from bohemia Summary. — Currently, the study of sexual dimorphism of ancient populations depends primarily on the right determination of the sex of the skeletons from specific archaeological cultures. These archaeological cultures cluster the skeletal remains into chronologically and geographically determined groups, or archaeologically defined populations. To approach the study of sexual dimorphism in some ancient "archaeological" populations, we applied the iterative method of primary and secondary sex diagnosis as an alternative to the direct sex determinations method which usually focuses also on the analysis of cranial traits. The first step was to determinate the sex of the skeletons which had innominates, using metrical and morphological pelvic traits. The pelvis has been shown to exhibit a maximal degree of sexual dimorphism among the all of the bones of the human skeleton. It has been suggested also that the sexual dimorphism of this bone is diachronically stable. This is the reason we chose this part of the skeleton a primary indicator of sex. Subsequently, based on other measurements of the skeletons for which sex has been determined by our primary pelvic diagnosis, we computed the relevant discriminant functions to be used in the secondary diagnosis of those skeletons without a pelvis. We have determined the sex using several discrimination functions only in these cases with the average posterior probability of association of particular skeleton with one or other sexual category is higher than 90% (clearly defined cases). The sex estimation was carried out also in those cases with the average posterior probability between 80 and 90% (the skeletons determined with a question mark). The sex determined by this iterative method was then compared with the direct determination of sex considering also with the pelvis the cranial traits. This revealed that differences were found only in those skeletons previously evaluated as males, now determined to be females by our iterative method. These differences between the results of the methods were noted mainly for the skeletons from the Unetice culture, which chronologically appear in the latest period of our sample. This raises the question if this difference can be explained by a morphological change of craniofacial features or "degracilisation" previously observed to be associated with the end of the third millennium ВС in Europe. The direct method of sexing skeletons considering cranial robusticity would lead to a relatively higher degree of errors. We have also studied the relationships between anthropological sex determination and archaeological characteristics of the Late Eneolithic burials (2900-2300 ВС) that belong to the two great cultural complexes in Europe: Corded Ware Culture and Bell Beakers Culture. We have distinguished two basic cultural elements based on the archaeological evidence: orientation of the grave and the original position of the skeleton. Both of these elements correlate highly with our iterative method of the sex determination. The skeletons for which assigned sex differs depending on the method employed, or whose orientation and position in the grave would also suggest a different sex determination, should be sexed by molecular methods. In the Corded Ware and Bell Beakers funerary practices, specifically in cemeteries containing single burials, great attention was paid to the symbolic expression of identity, as it is expressed by categories of uniform funerary practices for age and sex groups. Evident is the expression of an individual's association with a particular social category (such as gender), rather than special skills or status achieved within that persons life. Funerary practices in the Corded Ware Culture, as well as the Bell Beaker Culture, can be assumed to be a reflection of the social division of labour within the community and can also reflect the contrasting social roles of men and women in the prehistoric periods under study. The individuality expressed within the context of a single burial can also reflect the association of the deceased with a particular
机译:来自波希米亚的晚真石时期和青铜时代人群的颅骨后骨骼遗骸的性别确定和性别二态性的迭代方法摘要。 —当前,对古代人群性二态性的研究主要取决于对特定考古文化中骨骼性别的正确确定。这些考古文化将骨骼遗骸按时间和地理条件分为几类,或者按考古确定的种群。为了研究某些古代“考古”人群中的性别二态性,我们采用了主要和次要性别诊断的迭代方法,来代替通常直接关注颅骨特征分析的直接性别确定方法。第一步是使用骨盆和形态骨盆特征来确定具有纯正骨骼的骨骼的性别。骨盆已显示出在人类骨骼的所有骨骼中最大程度的性二态性。还已经提出,该骨骼的性二态性历时稳定。这就是我们选择骨骼的这一部分作为性别的主要指标的原因。随后,根据已通过我们的主要骨盆诊断确定性别的骨骼的其他测量结果,我们计算了相关的判别函数,用于那些没有骨盆的骨骼的二次诊断。我们仅在这些情况下使用几种判别函数确定性别,特定骨骼与一种或其他性别类别相关的平均后验概率高于90%(明确定义的情况)。在那些平均后验概率在80%到90%之间(用问号确定骨骼)的情况下,也进行了性别估计。然后将通过这种迭代方法确定的性别与直接确定的性别进行比较,同时还要考虑骨盆的颅骨特征。这表明,仅在先前评估为男性的骨骼中发现了差异,现在通过我们的迭代方法确定为女性。方法结果之间的这些差异主要针对Unetice文化的骨骼,这些骨骼按时间顺序出现在我们样本的最新时期。这就提出了一个问题,这种差异是否可以通过先前观察到的与欧洲第三个千禧年末相关的颅面特征的形态变化或“脱屑”来解释。考虑颅骨鲁棒性的骨骼性别鉴定的直接方法将导致相对较高的误差。我们还研究了人类学性别确定与晚期石器时代墓葬(2900-2300ВС)考古特征之间的关系,这些墓葬属于欧洲的两种重要文化建筑群:有线商品文化和贝尔烧杯文化。根据考古证据,我们区分了两种基本的文化元素:坟墓的方位和骨骼的原始位置。这两个要素与我们确定性别的迭代方法高度相关。所分配性别的骨骼取决于所采用的方法,或者其在墓穴中的方位和位置也暗示着不同的性别确定,应通过分子方法进行性别鉴定。在有线洁具和贝尔·贝克烧杯的葬礼实践中,特别是在包含单个墓葬的墓地中,人们非常重视身份的象征性表达,因为它由针对年龄和性别的统一葬礼实践的类别来表达。明显是个人与特定社会类别(例如性别)的联系的表达,而不是在该人的生活中获得的特殊技能或地位。有线商品文化和贝尔烧杯文化中的葬活动可以被认为是社区内部劳动分工的反映,也可以反映出史前时期男女在社会上的对比作用。在一次葬礼的背景下表达的个性也可以反映死者与某人的关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号