首页> 外文OA文献 >Australian approaches for managing ‘country’ using Indigenous and non-Indigenous knowledge
【2h】

Australian approaches for managing ‘country’ using Indigenous and non-Indigenous knowledge

机译:澳大利亚使用土著和非土著知识管理“国家”的方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper synthesises the lessons learnt and challenges encountered when applying Indigenous and non-Indigenous knowledge and methods in natural and cultural resource management (NCRM) in northern and central Australia. We primarily draw on the papers within this special issue of Ecological Management & Restoration, which originated largely from the Indigenous land management symposium at the 2010 Ecological Society of Australia conference. Many of the papers and therefore this article discuss practical experiences that offer insight for enhanced on-ground cross-cultural NCRM and can inform broader thinking and theoretical critiques. A wider literature is also drawn upon to substantiate the points and broaden the scope of the synthesis. Four key themes for consideration in collaborative cross-cultural NCRM are discussed. They are as follows: 1. The differences in environmental philosophy between Indigenous and non-Indigenous cultures which profoundly shape perceptions of environmental management; 2. Cross-cultural awareness of Indigenous and non-Indigenous knowledge and methods; 3. The mechanics of two-way approaches to ecological research and managing country (NCRM as perceived by Indigenous people) and 4. Operational challenges for Indigenous NCRM organisations. To conclude, we point out five broad principles for managing country using Indigenous and non-Indigenous knowledge: (i) Recognise the validity of both Indigenous and non-Indigenous environmental philosophies; (ii) Create more opportunities for improved cross-cultural understanding, respect and collaborations; (iii) Involve Indigenous people and their knowledge and interests at all stages of the Indigenous NCRM project or research (including planning, design, implementation, communication and evaluation); (iv) Ensure that time and continuity of effort and resources are available (to undertake participatory processes and for trust-building and innovation) and (v) Establish high-level political support through legal and policy frameworks to maintain continuity of government commitment to Indigenous NCRM.
机译:本文总结了在澳大利亚北部和中部将自然和文化资源管理(NCRM)应用土著和非土著知识和方法时的经验教训和遇到的挑战。在本期《生态管理与恢复》特刊中,我们主要借鉴了这些论文,这些论文主要源于2010年澳大利亚生态学会会议上的土著土地管理专题讨论会。因此,本文中的许多文章都讨论了实践经验,这些经验为增强地面跨文化NCRM提供了见识,并且可以为更广泛的思想和理论批评提供参考。还引用了更广泛的文献来证实这些要点并扩大合成范围。讨论了跨文化协作式NCRM中需要考虑的四个关键主题。它们如下:1.土著和非土著文化之间在环境理念上的差异深刻地塑造了对环境管理的看法; 2.对土著和非土著知识和方法的跨文化意识; 3.进行生态研究和管理国家的双向方法的机制(土著人民认为是NCRM),并且4.土著NCRM组织的运作挑战。最后,我们指出了使用土著和非土著知识管理国家的五项主要原则:(i)认识到土著和非土著环境哲学的有效性; ii为增进跨文化的理解,尊重和合作创造更多机会; (iii)在土著NCRM项目或研究的各个阶段(包括规划,设计,实施,沟通和评估),让土著人民及其知识和利益参与其中; (iv)确保有时间和连续性来提供努力和资源(以进行参与性过程以及建立信任和创新),并且(v)通过法律和政策框架建立高层政治支持,以维持政府对土著居民承诺的连续性NCRM。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号