首页> 外文OA文献 >Ownership structure and choice of issue method in seasoned equity offerings - European evidence
【2h】

Ownership structure and choice of issue method in seasoned equity offerings - European evidence

机译:经验丰富的股票发行中的所有权结构和发行方式的选择-欧洲证据

摘要

PURPOSE OF THE STUDYThe purpose of the thesis is to provide new evidence on seasoned equity offerings (SEOs) in Europe. The thesis addresses the lack of empirical research on different public issue types, in particular the distinction between fully marketed offerings and accelerated offers, in addition to studying ownership characteristics. More specifically, new evidence is provided on the influence of the issue method, institutional ownership, and ownership concentration on the offer price discount, announcement effect, and long-run post-issue returns; and to whether ownership characteristics affect the choice of issue method. DATAThe data on SEOs employed in the thesis is sourced from the Dealogic database, which provides the needed classification for the issue type absent in the SDC database. The sample consists of SEOs carried out in Europe during the period 2000-2005, with the total number of SEOs amounting to 364. The data on ownership characteristics consists of pre and post-issue institutional holding and ownership concentration, and has been manually handpicked from Thomson Financial. Data on various firm characteristics is sourced from Thomson Financial and Dealogic, while stock prices and market indices are retrieved from Datastream.RESULTSThe results indicate that SEOs which are carried out by a fully marketed process suffer to a lesser extent from the offer price discount than SEOs which are carried out by an accelerated process. On the other hand, ownership characteristics do not seem to affect the offer price discount. The announcement effect is not affected by the issue method or ownership characteristics. Additionally, high ownership concentration is negatively associated with 24 and 36-month post-issue returns. High institutional holding is positively associated with 24-month post-issue returns – however this result is not observable for 36-month returns. The issue method does not seem to affect post-issue returns. Finally, SEOs which are characterized by high pre-issue institutional ownership and low pre-issue ownership concentration are likely to be carried out by an accelerated process.
机译:研究目的本文的目的是为欧洲的经验丰富的股票发行(SEO)提供新的证据。除了解决所有权特征外,本文还解决了缺乏对不同公开发行类型的实证研究的问题,特别是完全上市发行和加速发行之间的区别。更具体地说,提供了有关发行方法,机构所有权和所有权集中度对发行价折扣,公告效应和长期发行后收益的影响的新证据;所有权特征是否会影响发行方式的选择。数据本文采用的SEO数据来自Dealogic数据库,该数据库为SDC数据库中缺少的问题类型提供了所需的分类。该样本包括2000年至2005年期间在欧洲进行的SEO,其SEO总数为364个。所有权特征数据包括发行前和发行后的机构持股和所有权集中度,并从汤姆森金融。有关各种公司特征的数据来自Thomson Financial和Dealogic,而股票价格和市场指数则来自Datastream。结果表明,通过完全市场化流程执行的SEO与SEO相比,报价折价受到的影响要小得多。这是通过加速过程来完成的。另一方面,所有权特征似乎并不影响要约价格折扣。公告的效果不受发行方法或所有权特征的影响。此外,较高的所有权集中度与发行后24个月和36个月的回报有负相关关系。较高的机构持仓量与24个月的发行后收益呈正相关关系-但是,对于36个月的收益,这一结果是不可观察的。发行方法似乎并不影响发行后的收益。最后,具有较高的发行前机构所有权和较低的发行前所有权集中度的SEO可能会通过加速过程来执行。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ruutu Konsta;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号