首页> 外文OA文献 >Ecology of the black flying fox, Pteropus alecto, in the seasonal tropics of the Northern Territory: resource tracking in a landscape mosaic and role in seed dispersal
【2h】

Ecology of the black flying fox, Pteropus alecto, in the seasonal tropics of the Northern Territory: resource tracking in a landscape mosaic and role in seed dispersal

机译:北领地热带地区的黑狐狐的生态学:在景观马赛克中的资源追踪及其在种子传播中的作用

摘要

Radio telemetry was used to investigate roosting and movement patterns of the black flying fox (Pteropus alecto) in the seasonal tropics of the Northern Territory. Sixteen P. alecto were tracked during a 12 month period to 34 roosts and were recorded at 49 foraging sites. Pteropus alecto moved roosts seasonally, from bamboo and mangrove habitats in the dry season to rainforest in the wet season. All radio-collared male and female P. alecto roosted in rainforest during the major part of the wet season. Climatic influences may be responsible for this behaviour with rainforest perhaps providing stable temperatures and shelter from the monsoonal rains. There was a significant seasonal difference in the distances moved by females between successive roosts. There was an association between roosting and foraging habitat: P. alecto roosting in bamboo and mangroves foraged predominantly in woodland, P. alecto roosting in rainforest foraged in Melaleuca spp and rainforest habitat. Females covered greater distances from roosts to foraging locations than did males. Distances from roosts to foraging sites were reduced for males and females during the build-up season (September to November) and wet season (December to April). Seasonally, foraging habitat shifted both floristically and spatially with no significant difference between the sexes. The movements of one female P. alecto were recorded at hourly intervals over three consecutive nights at the beginning of the wet season. Movement patterns were very similar between nights and over these three nights she foraged in at least 7 distinct locations. The total distance moved per night was 15.5 km to 19.9 km including return distance to the roost, assuming straight line movements. Most foraging was done less than 6 km from the roost. The ratio of total distance moved with respect to mean roost to forage site distance was similar between nights (3.8- 4.3), suggesting that a single roost site to forage site distance recorded during this study can provide an index of total foraging distance. Radio-collared animals selected foraging sites that were richer in flower or fruit resources when compared to floristically similar sites. Pteropus alecto moved throughout the landscape in response to the flowering and fruiting of a number of plant species in different habitats. Pteropus alecto foraged only in canopy or emergent trees and foraged on the flowers and fruit from 23 species in 11 families. It appears that P. alecto has sophisticated strategies for tracking the availability of patchy resources that occur in reasonably high densities. The likely probability of ingested seeds being dispersed between rainforest patches was assessed. When gut transit time for seeds, wet season distances and movement patterns for radio-collared P. alecto are incorporated into a seed dispersal model, it becomes evident that P. alecto is an important disperser of seeds between different rainforest patches. Pteropus alecto roosted or foraged in six major habitat types in the study area suggesting a flexible strategy for exploiting patchily distributed resources in the seasonal tropics of northern Australia. Land tenure status identified for foraging and roosting positions recorded for P. alecto emphasises the lack of protection for habitats used by this species. Only 3% of foraging or roosting positions were recorded in any type of conservation reserve. Pteropus alecto requires a range of habitats over a large area for roosting and foraging requirements. No matter how well placed conservation reserves are, P. alecto will be substantially dependent on differing types of off-reserve land. Therefore, we need to develop and implement off-reserve land management practices that take into account P.alectou27s seasonally distinctive and sometimes contrasting requirements for roosting and foraging habitat.
机译:无线电遥测技术用于调查北领地热带地区的黑狐(Pteropus alecto)的栖息地和运动方式。在12个月内跟踪了16个P.lectiolectic栖于34个栖息地,并在49个觅食点进行了记录。翼手龙(Pteropus alecto)季节性地移动栖息地,从干旱季节的竹林和红树林栖息地到雨季的雨林。在雨季的大部分时间,所有无线电领的雄性和雌性P. alecto都栖息在雨林中。气候影响可能是造成这种现象的原因,雨林可能提供稳定的温度并避开季风雨。在雌雄之间连续移动的距离之间存在明显的季节性差异。在栖息地和觅食栖息地之间存在关联:竹子和红树林主要在林地中觅食的P. alecto栖息地,千层树和雨林栖息地中觅食的雨林中的P. alecto栖息地。与雄性相比,雌性从栖息地到觅食地点的距离更大。在增收季节(9月至11月)和雨季(12月至4月),雄性和雌性从栖息地到觅食点的距离缩短。在季节性上,觅食生境在植物学上和空间上都发生了变化,而性别之间没有显着差异。在雨季开始的连续三个晚上,每小时记录一次雌性体育电单车的运动。晚上之间的移动方式非常相似,在这三个晚上中,她至少在7个不同的地方觅食。假设直线运动,每晚移动的总距离为15.5 km至19.9 km,其中包括到栖息地的返回距离。大部分觅食是在距栖息地不到6公里的地方进行的。在夜晚之间,相对于平均栖息地与觅食点距离的移动总距离之比相似(3.8-4.3),这表明在这项研究中记录的单个栖息地与觅食点距离可以提供总觅食距离的指标。与植物区系相似的地点相比,放射领动物选择的觅食地点花或水果资源丰富。由于不同生境中许多植物物种的开花结果,翼手龙在整个景观中移动。翼手龙仅在冠层或新兴树木中觅食,并在11个科的23种花和果实上觅食。看来P. alecto具有复杂的策略来跟踪以合理高密度出现的斑块资源的可用性。评估了摄入的种子散布在热带雨林之间的可能性。当将种子的肠道运输时间,湿季距离和放射性领生的P. alecto的运动模式纳入种子传播模型时,很明显P. alecto是不同雨林斑块之间种子的重要分散剂。在研究区域的六种主要生境类型中栖息或觅食的翼手龙提示在澳大利亚北部的季节性热带地区开发零星分布的资源的灵活策略。记录的为P. alecto的觅食和栖息地确定的土地保有权状况强调了对该物种使用的生境缺乏保护。在任何类型的保护区中仅记录了3%的觅食或栖息地。翼手龙需要大面积的栖息地,以栖息和觅食。无论保护储备的位置如何,P。alecto都将很大程度上取决于不同类型的保护区。因此,我们需要开发和实施保护区外的土地管理做法,并考虑到P.alecto的季节性特征,有时需要在栖息地和觅食地上形成对比。

著录项

  • 作者

    Palmer Carol;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1997
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号