首页> 外文OA文献 >Perceptions of changing power, dyadic rivalries and security dilemma mechanisms in the wider Black Sea area
【2h】

Perceptions of changing power, dyadic rivalries and security dilemma mechanisms in the wider Black Sea area

机译:对更广泛的黑海地区不断变化的权力,二元对立和安全困境机制的看法

摘要

The NATO/EU countries and the Russian Federation have a common neighborhood in Eastern Europe, which includes the Black Sea region. This area could be defined as a "security complex", whose security architecture is made by the interaction of the various state and non-state actors, or as a geopolitical region. The riparian states are very heterogenous, they greatly differ in territory, population, economy and strategic affilitions. One important problem is that these countries – Bulgaria, Romania, Russia, Georgia, Ukraine and Turkey, plus the nonriparian ones -the Republic of Moldova, Armenia and Azerbaijan- do not have the same strategic culture, or similar national interests, they do not perceive themselves, at the level of political and economic elites, as being part of the same area and having a common regional identity. No regional organisation plays the role of EU or NATO and this increases the insecurity perceptions among rival actors. Moscow wants to create a "buffer" area by putting pressure on the NATO/EU states to stop the enlargement process and proposes political and economical alternatives like the CSI Collective Security Treaty and the Eurasian Economic Union, while the West wants the Black Sea countries to remain NATO partners (via the PfP) and possible members (Ukraine and Georgia were promised NATO membership in April 2008 at the Bucharest Summit), and also economic/political partners for the EU via the Eastern Partnership and the free trade agreements. The lack of trust and even fear between Russia and the Western states generated, since 2014 (when Crimea was illegally annexed by Russia), accusations, provocative actions and arms building, economic sanctions, thus fostering a "security dilemma" mechanism which is to be explained not only by structural factors like systemic power polarity, predominance of offensive/defensive weapons, but also by psycho-cognitive perceptions of decision-makers. The fact that some states’ leaders perceive the balance of power in the Black Sea as being in a process of rapid change in economy, military, demographics may generate attempts to take profit of or close the windows of vulnerability, increasing the likelihood of regional military or "hybrid" conflicts.
机译:北约/欧盟国家和俄罗斯联邦在东欧有一个共同的社区,其中包括黑海地区。该区域可以定义为“安全综合体”,其安全体系结构是由各个国家和非国家行为者的互动构成的,或者是地缘政治区域。河岸国家是非常不同的国家,它们在领土,人口,经济和战略关系上有很大的不同。一个重要的问题是,这些国家-保加利亚,罗马尼亚,俄罗斯,格鲁吉亚,乌克兰和土耳其,以及非河岸国家-摩尔多瓦共和国,亚美尼亚和阿塞拜疆-没有相同的战略文化或相似的国家利益,它们没有在政治和经济精英层将自己视为同一地区的一部分,并具有共同的地区特征。没有区域组织在欧盟或北约中扮演角色,这加剧了敌对行动者之间的不安全感。莫斯科希望通过向北约/欧盟国家施加压力以阻止扩大进程来创建“缓冲区”区域,并提出诸如《 CSI集体安全条约》和《欧亚经济联盟》之类的政治和经济替代方案,而西方则希望黑海国家仍然是北约伙伴(通过PfP)和可能的成员(在2008年4月的布加勒斯特峰会上向乌克兰和格鲁吉亚承诺加入北约),以及通过东部伙伴关系和自由贸易协定成为欧盟的经济/政治伙伴。自2014年以来(俄罗斯将克里米亚非法吞并)以来,俄罗斯与西方国家之间缺乏信任甚至恐惧,这导致了指控,挑衅行动和军备建设,经济制裁,从而助长了“安全困境”机制不仅可以通过系统性权力极性,进攻/防御性武器的优势等结构性因素来解释,而且可以通过决策者的心理认知来进行解释。一些国家的领导人认为黑海的力量平衡正处于经济,军事,人口结构快速变化的过程中,这可能会导致企图牟取暴利或关闭脆弱的窗口,从而增加了区域军事力量的可能性。或“混合”冲突。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cioculescu Șerban Filip;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号