首页> 外文OA文献 >The Paradox of Confrontation: Experimental Evidence on the Audience Effects of Protestud
【2h】

The Paradox of Confrontation: Experimental Evidence on the Audience Effects of Protestud

机译:对抗悖论:关于抗议的受众效果的实验证据 ud

摘要

Do protests increase or decrease political engagement among the general public? Despite the fact that social movements so often aspire to persuade and engage civil society, scholars have largely neglected these consequences of protest activity. I argue that protest is a double-edged sword. People may become enthusiastic and engaged when they hear of protests through the news, but they disengage when faced with an actual protest. This suggestion challenges the vast majority of social movement literature, which is highly aware of the protesters’ need to occupy and interrupt public life in order to capture an audience, but widely assumes that the public does not mind the interruption. This dissertation considers the possibility that the public begrudges its role as a captive audience and focuses more on the inconvenience of the event than the message. I approach this research question through a combination of two experimental designs and observational data. First, I embed a vignette experiment into a baseline phone survey in Mexico City. This experiment treats individuals with crafted news stories about protests that have randomized characteristics. The second experiment tests a different type of protest exposure, i.e., real confrontation. In this experiment, all respondents from the baseline were invited to take part in face-to-face interviews at designated times and places. Respondents in the treatment groups are interviewed during one of two protests, while respondents in the control group were interviewed on a day with no protests. All of the treatments in the vignette and field experiments take advantage of real protests that arose in opposition to the apparent killing of 43 student teachers from the Ayotzinapa teachers’ college in southern Mexico. Then, using new techniques to isolate and test competing causal mechanisms, I examine the specific mediators – emotions, conflict aversion, and political efficacy - that might link protests to political engagement. To complement the experimental results, I test the external validity of my findings with municipal-level data in Brazil, a country that shares similar patterns of protest activity with Mexico but differs in its protest geography.
机译:抗议会增加还是减少公众之间的政治参与?尽管事实上社会运动常常渴望说服和参与民间社会,但学者们在很大程度上忽略了抗议活动的这些后果。我认为抗议是一把双刃剑。人们通过新闻听到抗议活动时可能会变得充满热情和参与,但是当面对实际抗议时他们会脱离。这一建议对绝大多数社会运动文献提出了挑战,这些文献高度意识到抗议者需要占领和打扰公众生活以吸引观众,但广泛认为公众不介意打扰。本文考虑了公众可能会its惜其作为俘虏听众的作用,并更多地关注事件的不便而不是信息。我通过结合两个实验设计和观察数据来解决这个研究问题。首先,我将小插图实验嵌入了墨西哥城的基线电话调查中。此实验使用具有随机特征的关于抗议活动的精心制作的新闻报道来对待个人。第二个实验测试了不同类型的抗议活动,即真实对抗。在此实验中,邀请了所有来自基线的受访者在指定的时间和地点进行面对面的采访。在两次抗议活动之一期间,对治疗组的受访者进行了采访,而对照组的受访者在没有抗议的情况下接受了一天的采访。小插图和野外实验中的所有处理方法都利用了真正的抗议活动,该抗议活动是与明显杀害墨西哥南部Ayotzinapa师范学院的43名学生老师相抵触的。然后,我使用新技术来隔离和测试相互竞争的因果机制,研究了可能将抗议活动与政治参与联系起来的特定中介者(情绪,冲突规避和政治效力)。为了补充实验结果,我使用巴西的市级数据测试了我的发现的外部有效性,该国与墨西哥有着相似的抗议活动模式,但抗议地理位置不同。

著录项

  • 作者

    Schwartz Cassilde;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号