首页> 外文OA文献 >LIFE CYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE USES OF NATURAL GAS-FIRED EQUIPMENT IN BUILDINGS
【2h】

LIFE CYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE USES OF NATURAL GAS-FIRED EQUIPMENT IN BUILDINGS

机译:建筑物中天然气供热设备替代用途的生命周期环境影响分析

摘要

LIFE CYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE USESOF NATURAL GAS-FIRED EQUIPMENT IN BUILDINGSAyat Ezzeldin Osman, MSUniversity of Pittsburgh, 2002Cogeneration systems offer an opportunity to satisfy buildings' electrical and thermal loads, which could result inoverall energy efficiency improvements and lower emissions to the environment. The objective of this research is touse a life cycle assessment framework to evaluate the environmental impact of using natural gas-fired technologiesfor heating, cooling and electrical energy generation in buildings. The natural gas-fired cogeneration systemsexamined were solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC), microturbine, and internal combustion engine (ICE). These systemswere compared to two systems representing conventional practice: average electric generation mix in the U.S. andnatural gas combined cycle electric generation (NGCC) for electrical energy; electric chillers (EC) and absorptionchillers (AC) for cooling; and natural gas-fired boilers for heating.A large commercial office building was used as a hypothetical case study. Typical building characteristics from theCommercial Building Energy Consumption Survey (Sezgen et al., 1995) in combination with simulation softwarewere used to obtain the building's electrical, heating, and cooling energy use. The building's energy use and processdescriptions were used to construct life cycle models with the aid of life cycle assessment software.The results of the research include analysis of the environmental impact from the use of the different energy systemsin the building and comparisons between different operational strategies for the cogeneration systems: thermal loadfollowing (TLF) and electrical load following (TLF). Under the assumptions in this study, the main findings werethat cogeneration systems performed better with ELF when the thermal load of the building was high; energyconsumption and emissions were reduced when AC or combination of AC and EC were used for cooling withcogeneration systems, except for the SOFC, which performed equally well with EC only; and the 3-MW ICE (ELF)using combination of AC and EC, and the SOFC using EC (ELF) showed the best performance given the indicatorsand systems considered.
机译:建筑物中天然气供热设备替代用途的生命周期环境影响分析匹兹堡大学的Yay Ezzeldin Osman,2002年匹兹堡大学热电联产系统为满足建筑物的电气和热负荷提供了机会,这可能会导致整体能源效率的提高并减少对环境的排放。这项研究的目的是使用生命周期评估框架来评估使用天然气技术在建筑物中供暖,制冷和发电的环境影响。检验的天然气热电联产系统包括固体氧化物燃料电池(SOFC),微型涡轮机和内燃机(ICE)。将这些系统与代表常规做法的两个系统进行了比较:美国的平均发电混合和电能的天然气联合循环发电(NGCC);以及电冷却器(EC)和吸收式冷却器(AC)进行冷却;假设使用大型商业办公楼作为案例研究。商业建筑能耗调查(Sezgen等,1995)中的典型建筑特征与模拟软件结合使用,获得了建筑的电力,供暖和制冷能耗。借助生命周期评估软件,利用建筑物的能源使用和过程描述来构建生命周期模型。研究结果包括分析建筑物中不同能源系统的使用对环境的影响,以及不同运营策略之间的比较。热电联产系统:热负荷跟踪(TLF)和电负荷跟踪(TLF)。根据这项研究的假设,主要发现是,当建筑物的热负荷较高时,热电联产系统的ELF性能更好;当使用AC或AC和EC的组合来冷却热电联产系统时,能源消耗和排放量减少了,但SOFC除外,SOFC的性能仅与EC相同。考虑到所考虑的指标和系统,使用AC和EC组合的3-MW ICE(ELF)和使用EC(ELF)的SOFC表现出最佳性能。

著录项

  • 作者

    Osman Ayat Ezzeldin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2003
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号