首页> 外文OA文献 >Decolonizing the Centralist Mind: Legal Pluralism and the Rule of Law
【2h】

Decolonizing the Centralist Mind: Legal Pluralism and the Rule of Law

机译:非中央集权化:法律多元化与法治

摘要

By and large, in the study of the rule of law and in programmatic efforts in the field to achieve it, sufficient heed has not been paid to the central lesson that legal pluralism has laid bare. This is that in any social field, there is more than one functioning legal system. In other words, state law invariably operates together with other legal systems in the same social field, each of which is "semi-autonomous" in its workings and none of which enjoys a monopoly on the maintenance of order. Indeed, there is much evidence that the role of the state as a global matter is evolving in a fashion that might very well decrease its influence in this complex system. Until and unless rule of law reformers grow acculturated to these realities, efforts to institute the rule of law are likely to fall well short of expectations. This involves more than merely understanding how different legal systems operate in the broader social matrix. It even involves more than making the obvious concession to reality that any rule of law program operating in the developing world must, and often does, make; namely, that there are functioning nonstate systems, that they tend to dominate the legal landscape, and that they must therefore be a matter of premier concern. More centrally, it requires a form of decolonization of the mind. Specifically, rule of law policies and programs must come to realize that legal systems that are autonomous of state law will invariably exist, irrespective of what type of rule of law society ultimately emerges. This chapter explores the deficiencies associated with the legal centralist assumption in the context of rule of law efforts, and the means by which rule of law as an operational matter could be better deployed once we deacculturate ourselves from that unjustified assumption. While the lessons are intended to be universal, the reference used to illustrate the point is the Islamic world, particularly Shi'i dominated central and southern Iraq.
机译:总的来说,在研究法治和在实地进行法治的方案努力中,人们对立法多元化已暴露的中心课没有给予足够的重视。这就是说,在任何社会领域中,都有不止一个运作正常的法律体系。换句话说,州法始终与同一社会领域中的其他法律体系一起运作,每个法律体系在工作中都是“半自治的”,而且没有一个在维持秩序方面享有垄断地位。确实,有很多证据表明,国家作为全球事务的角色正在以可能会大大降低其在这个复杂系统中的影响的方式发展。在法治改革者适应这些现实之前,除非如此,否则建立法治的努力可能远远达不到预期。这不仅仅涉及理解不同法律体系如何在更广泛的社会矩阵中运作。它甚至不仅仅对现实作出让步,在发展中国家运行的任何法治计划都必须而且经常这样做。就是说,存在着运作良好的非国家体系,它们倾向于主导法律领域,因此,它们必须成为首要关注的问题。更重要的是,它需要一种形式的思想非殖民化。特别是,法治政策和计划必须认识到,无论社会最终形成何种类型的法治,都将始终存在独立于州法的法律体系。本章探讨了在法治努力的背景下与法律集中主义假设有关的缺陷,以及一旦我们摆脱了这种不合理的假设,就可以更好地利用法治作为业务事项的方法。虽然这些课程旨在普及,但用来说明这一点的参考文献是伊斯兰世界,尤其是什叶派主导的伊拉克中部和南部。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hamoudi Haider Ala;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号