首页> 外文OA文献 >Popular Political Participation in the Late Roman Republic
【2h】

Popular Political Participation in the Late Roman Republic

机译:晚期罗马共和国的民众政治参与

摘要

Roman democracy is in fashion. In particular, the publication of Fergus Millar's The Crowd in the Late Republic (1998) has stimulated debate on thedemocratic elements in Roman government during this period. In this thesis I examine the nature of popular participation in the late Roman Republic. I focus on the decision-making power of the populus Romanus and popular pressure to effect reform in the favour of citizens outside thesenatorial and equestrian orders. My findings are based on analysis of ancient literary and epigraphic sources, along with a critique of modern research on the topic. The first chapter introduces the subject with a survey of current scholarly opinion and discussion of key concepts and terms. Chapter Two investigates how power was shared between senatus populusque Romanusand the distribution of power in the assemblies, concluding that participation was widespread as a result of the changing circumstances in the late Republic. As farmers and veterans moved to Rome, and slaves were freed and granted citizenship and the right to vote, the balance was tipped in the favour of the non-elite voter. Each class of the populus Romanus could participate in Roman politics, and certainly members of each did. Having concluded my analysis of the formal avenues of participation, I move onto the informal. Chapter Three is the first of three chapters of case studies focusing on demonstrations and collective action which form the heart of this work. The first set of studies cover secession, mutiny and refusal of the draft. Chapter Four continues with studies of popularpressure to gain reforms to improve the food supply, restore tribunician power, obtain relief from crippling debt and land shortage. The finalchapter of analysis, Chapter Five, investigates collective action at contiones, legislative assemblies, trials, ludi et gladiatores, triumphs, funerals, and elections. The findings of these three chapters bring me to the conclusion that Rome was a democracy, if of a particular type. The nature of popular political participation in the late Republic resembled that of an emerging democracy with the non-elite gaining an increasing role in the decision-making process,albeit without constitutional definition. The citizens' right to participate in the formal assemblies was augmented by their ability to take part in less formal ways also. These informal methods ranged from popular involvement in contiones through to the application of pressure on senators through the threat of secession and mutiny. Only the rise of the principate, with formalised roles for the various sectors in society under one leader, brought these developments to an end.
机译:罗马民主正在流行。特别是,弗格斯·米勒(Fergus Millar)的《共和国后期的人群》(The Crowd in Republic Republic,1998)的出版激起了这一时期关于罗马政府民主要素的辩论。在这篇论文中,我考察了晚期罗马共和国民众参与的性质。我将重点放在罗马胡杨的决策权和民众进行改革,以实现民族和马术秩序之外的公民青睐的压力上。我的发现基于对古代文学和人口统计学资料的分析,以及对该主题的现代研究的批判。第一章通过对当前学术观点的调查以及对关键概念和术语的讨论来介绍该主题。第二章研究了罗马老人军如何在议会中分享权力以及议会中的权力分配,得出结论认为,由于共和国后期情况的变化,参与变得广泛。随着农民和退伍军人移居罗马,奴隶被释放并获得公民身份和选举权,这种平衡得到了非精英选民的青睐。罗马胡杨的每个阶层都可以参加罗马政治,当然每个成员都可以参加。在结束了对正式参与渠道的分析之后,我转向了非正式参与。第三章是案例研究的三章中的第一章,其重点是构成本工作核心的示威和集体行动。第一组研究包括对草案的分裂,叛变和拒绝。第四章继续对民众压力进行研究,以进行改革以改善粮食供应,恢复法医的权力,减轻债务和土地短缺的压力。分析的最后一章,第五章,研究了连任,立法会议,审判,审判与角斗士,胜利,葬礼和选举中的集体行动。这三章的发现使我得出这样的结论:罗马是一种民主,如果是一种特殊的民主。共和国后期的民众政治参与的性质类似于新兴的民主国家,尽管没有宪法的定义,但非精英人士在决策过程中的作用越来越大。公民参加非正式集会的权利也因其参加非正式形式的能力得到增强。这些非正式的方法范围广泛,从普遍参与制宪到通过分裂和叛变的威胁向参议员施加压力。只有一位本位领导人的崛起,在一个领导者的领导下,社会各部门的角色正式化,这些发展才得以终结。

著录项

  • 作者

    Earley Claudine Lana;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_NZ
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号