首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of strategies to reduce meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus rates in surgical patients: a controlled multicentre intervention trial.
【2h】

Comparison of strategies to reduce meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus rates in surgical patients: a controlled multicentre intervention trial.

机译:降低手术患者对甲氧西林耐药的金黄色葡萄球菌发生率的策略比较:一项受控的多中心干预试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: To compare the effect of two strategies (enhanced hand hygiene vs meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening and decolonisation) alone and in combination on MRSA rates in surgical wards. Design: Prospective, controlled, interventional cohort study, with 6-month baseline, 12-month intervention and 6-month washout phases. Setting: 33 surgical wards of 10 hospitals in nine countries in Europe and Israel. Participants: All patients admitted to the enrolled wards for more than 24 h. Interventions: The two strategies compared were (1) enhanced hand hygiene promotion and (2) universal MRSA screening with contact precautions and decolonisation (intranasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine bathing) of MRSA carriers. Four hospitals were assigned to each intervention and two hospitals combined both strategies, using targeted MRSA screening. Outcome measures: Monthly rates of MRSA clinical cultures per 100 susceptible patients (primary outcome) and MRSA infections per 100 admissions (secondary outcome). Planned subgroup analysis for clean surgery wards was performed. Results: After adjusting for clustering and potential confounders, neither strategy when used alone was associated with significant changes in MRSA rates. Combining both strategies was associated with a reduction in the rate of MRSA clinical cultures of 12% per month (adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.98). In clean surgery wards, strategy 2 (MRSA screening, contact precautions and decolonisation) was associated with decreasing rates of MRSA clinical cultures (15% monthly decrease, aIRR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.97) and MRSA infections (17% monthly decrease, aIRR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.99). Conclusions: In surgical wards with relatively low MRSA prevalence, a combination of enhanced standard and MRSA-specific infection control approaches was required to reduce MRSA rates. Implementation of single interventions was not effective, except in clean surgery wards where MRSA screening coupled with contact precautions and decolonisation was associated with significant reductions in MRSA clinical culture and infection rates. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00685867
机译:目的:比较两种策略(加强手部卫生与耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)筛查和非定殖)对手术病房中MRSA发生率的影响。设计:前瞻性,对照,干预性队列研究,基线为6个月,干预为12个月,洗脱期为6个月。地点:欧洲和以色列9个国家/地区的10家医院的33个外科病房。参加者:所有入院病房超过24小时的患者。干预措施:比较的两种策略是(1)促进手部卫生,以及(2)通过接触预防措施对MRSA进行全面MRSA筛查和非殖民化(鼻内莫匹罗星和洗必泰沐浴)。每种干预措施均分配了四家医院,两家医院采用针对性MRSA筛选结合了两种策略。结果测量:每100名易感患者的MRSA临床培养率(主要结果)和每100例入院的MRSA感染率(次要结果)。对清洁手术病房进行了计划的亚组分析。结果:在调整了聚类和潜在的混杂因素之后,单独使用两种策略均未与MRSA发生率的显着变化相关。结合使用这两种策略可使MRSA临床培养率每月降低12%(调整后的发生率比率(aIRR)为0.88,95%CI为0.79至0.98)。在清洁外科病房中,策略2(MRSA筛查,接触预防措施和非殖民化)与MRSA临床培养率(每月下降15%,aIRR 0.85、95%CI 0.74至0.97)和MRSA感染(每月下降17%, aIRR 0.83,95%CI 0.69至0.99)。结论:在MRSA患病率相对较低的外科病房中,需要结合使用增强的标准和MRSA特异性感染控制方法来降低MRSA发生率。单一干预措施的实施效果不佳,除非在干净的外科病房中,MRSA筛查,接触预防措施和非殖民化与MRSA临床培养和感染率显着降低相关。试用注册Clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00685867

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号