首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of CFD Predictions with Shuttle Global Flight Thermal Imagery and Discrete Surface Measurements
【2h】

Comparison of CFD Predictions with Shuttle Global Flight Thermal Imagery and Discrete Surface Measurements

机译:CFD预测与航天飞机全球飞行热成像和离散表面测量的比较

摘要

Surface temperature measurements from the STS-119 boundary-layer transition experiment on the space shuttle orbiter Discovery provide a rare opportunity to assess turbulent CFD models at hypersonic flight conditions. This flight data was acquired by on-board thermocouples and by infrared images taken off-board by the Hypersonic Thermodynamic Infrared Measurements (HYTHIRM) team, and is suitable for hypersonic CFD turbulence assessment between Mach 6 and 14. The primary assessment is for the Baldwin-Lomax and Cebeci-Smith algebraic turbulence models in the DPLR and LAURA CFD codes, respectively. A secondary assessment is made of the Shear-Stress Transport (SST) two-equation turbulence model in the DPLR code. Based upon surface temperature comparisons at eleven thermocouple locations, the algebraic-model turbulent CFD results average 4% lower than the measurements for Mach numbers less than 11. For Mach numbers greater than 11, the algebraic-model turbulent CFD results average 5% higher than the three available thermocouple measurements. Surface temperature predictions from the two SST cases were consistently 3 4% higher than the algebraic-model results. The thermocouple temperatures exhibit a change in trend with Mach number at about Mach 11; this trend is not reflected in the CFD results. Because the temperature trends from the turbulent CFD simulations and the flight data diverge above Mach 11, extrapolation of the turbulent CFD accuracy to higher Mach numbers is not recommended.
机译:STS-119边界层过渡实验在航天飞机“发现”号上进行的表面温度测量提供了难得的机会,可在高超声速飞行条件下评估湍流CFD模型。该飞行数据是通过机载热电偶和高超声速热力学红外测量(HYTHIRM)团队在机外拍摄的红外图像获取的,适用于6至14马赫的高超声速CFD湍流评估。主要评估是针对Baldwin DPLR和LAURA CFD代码中的-Lomax和Cebeci-Smith代数湍流模型。对DPLR代码中的剪切-应力运输(SST)两方程湍流模型进行了二次评估。根据在11个热电偶位置的表面温度比较,代数模型湍流CFD结果平均比小于11的马赫数的测量值低4%。对于大于11的马赫数,代数模型湍流CFD的结果比平均马赫数高5%。三种可用的热电偶测量值。两个SST案例的表面温度预测值始终比代数模型结果高3 4%。热电偶温度呈现出随马赫数变化约11马赫的趋势。这种趋势没有反映在CFD结果中。由于湍流CFD模拟和飞行数据的温度趋势在11马赫以上发散,因此不建议将CFD湍流精度外推到更高的马赫数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号