首页> 外文OA文献 >Reurbanisierung und residenzielle Selbstselektion – Determinanten der Standort- und Verkehrsmittelwahl Bewusster Innenstadtbewohner
【2h】

Reurbanisierung und residenzielle Selbstselektion – Determinanten der Standort- und Verkehrsmittelwahl Bewusster Innenstadtbewohner

机译:城镇化和住宅的自我选择-位置和交通方式的决定因素有意识的内城区居民

摘要

Starting point for this dissertation is the phenomenon of a “renaissance of the urban” or “reurbanisation” and the question of what consequences may arise from this trend concerning mobility and travel demand within urban areas. Besides that the thesis draws on the discussion on residential self-selection and the question to which extend spatial differences in travel behaviour may be attributed to the built environment directly or are results of attitude- / preference-induced residential location choices. The opening question of the dissertation thus is, whether reurbanisation is the result of travel oriented residential self-selection and vice versa what role accessibility may play within strategies to strengthen reurbanisation. In this context the main aim is to analyse the effects of residential self-selection on travel mode choice on two levels. On an individual level it is analysed whether reurbanisation is in part a result of residential self-selection and which effects on travel behaviour arise from that. On the collective level it is explored whether a group of “intentional urbanites” exists and how they vary from other groups of urban dwellers in terms of travel related attitudes and preferences. The analyses on both levels are based on extensive statistical data derived from a survey on location choice (comprising travel related attitudes and location preferences) and travel mode choice among “movers” (2.513 households with 5.126 individuals) in three German cities. The dataset contains cross-sectional data as well as quasi-longitudinal data from the time prior to location choice. On the individual level the effects of residential self-selection are assessed by means of statistical control within binary logistic regression models on location as well as travel mode choice. The identification of intentional urbanites is based upon a classification which draws on the concept of spatial match / mismatch. The logistic regression models on location choice provide evidence that choosing an inner city location is to a significant extent result of travel or accessibility related preferences and thus that self-selection is at work. Not surprisingly, especially households which prefer location where shops, working places etc. are in walking or biking distance have a high probability to self-select into inner urban areas. It can be concluded that reurbanisation is at least partly the result of travel related self-selection and that therefore specific urban accessibility qualities are an important urban asset to “fuel” reurbanisation. Furthermore the models prove the expected direct and indirect effects of residential self-selection on travel mode choice. Firstly the travel related location preferences have a strong direct effect on mode choice even when controlling for built environment and individual characteristics. Secondly it can be concluded that also indirect effects of location preferences via the built environment characteristics of the self-selected living location are existing. Based on the above mentioned classification a consonant group of “intentional urbanites” is identified and distinguished from other citizen groups namely “other urbanites” and “suburbanites”. The intentional urbanites represent about one third of the overall sample and two thirds of the inner city sample and thus are a relevant group for the development of travel demand. Compared with the other citizen groups a clear profile of the intentional urbanites concerning location preferences, travel related attitudes, car ownership as well as travel mode choice can be distinguished which is in line with the results on the individual level. Compared with other urbanites the Intentional urbanites a) have a stronger location preference for good short range accessibilities, b) have a significantly lower car ownership rate (before and after moving), c) show a significantly higher positive evaluation of attitudes on cycling as well as public transport (without negative evaluations of attitudes concerning car use), d) have a significantly higher share of bicycle trips and lower share of car trips, e) show a more multimodal behaviour.Therefore the intentional urbanites are a considerable potential for a sustainable development of urban mobility and travel demand. To make use of the potential active and consistent planning strategies have to be implemented. Besides focussing on mobility rather than traffic an adequate planning approach aims on creating dense, functionally diverse living environments and high quality transportation systems resulting in excellent accessibilities as well as providing attractive street design which promote the use of environmentally friendly travel modes. Besides that the results show that such strategies have to be accompanied by demand oriented measures. An integrated policy approach may then promote further self-selection and subsequently support reurbanisation.
机译:本文的出发点是“城市复兴”或“城市化”现象,以及这种趋势对城市地区的出行和出行需求可能产生什么后果的问题。除此以外,本文还讨论了居民的自我选择问题,而将出行行为空间差异扩展的问题可能直接归因于建筑环境,也可能是态度/偏好引起的居民区位选择的结果。因此,本文面临的开放性问题是,重新城市化是否是面向出行的居民自我选择的结果,反之亦然,可访问性在加强重新城市化的战略中可能扮演什么角色。在这种情况下,主要目的是从两个层面分析居民自我选择对出行方式选择的影响。在个人层面上,分析了重新城市化是否部分是由于居民的自我选择,以及由此产生的对出行行为的影响。在集体层面上,探讨了是否存在一群“有意向的城市居民”,以及他们在与旅行相关的态度和偏好方面与其他城市居民群体之间的差异。对这两个级别的分析均基于大量的统计数据,这些数据来自于对三个德国城市的“移动者”(2.513户家庭,有5.126个人)进行的位置选择(包括与旅行有关的态度和位置偏好)和旅行方式选择的调查。数据集包含横截面数据以及来自位置选择之前的时间的准纵向数据。在个人层面上,通过对位置以及出行方式选择的二元逻辑回归模型内的统计控制,来评估住宅自我选择的影响。故意城市居民的识别基于分类,该分类借鉴了空间匹配/不匹配的概念。关于位置选择的逻辑回归模型提供了证据,表明选择市中心的位置在很大程度上是与出行或可及性相关的偏好的结果,因此自我选择正在起作用。毫不奇怪,特别是喜欢在商店,工作场所等步行或骑自行车的地方居住的家庭,很可能会自行选择进入市区。可以得出结论,重新城市化至少部分是与旅行相关的自我选择的结果,因此特定的城市可达性质量是“加油”重新城市化的重要城市资产。此外,模型证明了居民自我选择对出行方式选择的预期直接和间接影响。首先,即使在控制建筑环境和个人特征时,与旅行相关的位置偏好也会对模式选择产生强烈的直接影响。其次,可以得出结论,通过自选居住地的建筑环境特征,还存在着位置偏好的间接影响。根据上述分类,确定了“故意城市居民”的辅音组,并将其与其他公民群体(“其他城市居民”和“郊区人”)区分开。故意城市居民约占整体样本的三分之一,而内城区样本则占三分之二,因此是发展出行需求的一个相关群体。与其他公民群体相比,可以区分出故意城市居民在位置偏好,出行相关态度,汽车拥有以及出行方式选择方面的概况,这与个人水平的结果相符。与其他城市居民相比,有意城市居民a)具有更好的短距离可达性的位置偏好,b)拥有较低的汽车拥有率(出行前后),c)对骑车态度的积极评价也高得多由于公共交通(未对使用汽车的态度进行负面评价),d)自行车出行的比例明显较高,而汽车出行的比例较低,e)显示出更多的多式联运行为,因此有意的城市居民具有可持续发展的巨大潜力发展城市交通和出行需求。为了利用潜在的积极和一致的计划策略,必须加以实施。除了着重于机动性而不是交通以外,适当的规划方法还旨在创建致密,功能多样的生活环境和高质量的交通系统,从而带来出色的可及性,并提供引人入胜的街道设计,促进使用环保的出行方式。除此之外,结果表明,此类策略必须伴随着面向需求的措施。然后,综合政策方法可以促进进一步的自我选择,并随后支持重新城市化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bruns André;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 ger
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号