首页> 外文OA文献 >Zur endovaskulären Therapie intrakranieller Aneurysmen mit verschiedenen Stents : eine experimentelle Analyse im Tiermodell
【2h】

Zur endovaskulären Therapie intrakranieller Aneurysmen mit verschiedenen Stents : eine experimentelle Analyse im Tiermodell

机译:用于不同支架的颅内动脉瘤的血管内治疗:在动物模型中的实验分析

摘要

The rupture of cerebral aneurysms causing subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recurrent hemorrhage after acute SAH by re-rupture occures in more than 20% and poses a serious threat to the patient with often devastating consequences. Therefore, treatment of ruptured aneurysms is mandatory. While Guglielmi detachable coil (GDC) systems have been widely accepted as an endovascular treatment option, primary stenting of aneurysms using porous stents, stentgrafts, or implantation of coils after stent placement constitute emerging but still experimental techniques in endovascular treatment strategies. The aim of the present study was to use an animal model to investigate these different approaches to treat cerebral aneurysms concerning the rate of closure, the histopathological changes within the aneurysm cavity and the parent vessel after stent placement. We created aneurysms in 30 rabbits by distal ligation and intraluminal incubation of the right common carotid artery with elastase. This enzyme digested the internal elastic lamina leading in subsequent aneurysmatic dilatation of the thus created vessel stump. 10 animals were treated with porous stents alone and 10 rabbits with stentgrafts (polyurethane covered stents). Furthermore 10 animals were treated with the current gold standard by using electrolytically detachable coils. Five animals in each group were observed for 1 month, the other animals were observed for 3 months. After the observation period a DSA series was performed to evaluate the final angiographic results. Thereafter, the animals were euthanasized and the brachiocephalic trunk, the right subclavian artery up to the vertebral artery and the aneurysm were resected en bloc and rapidly fixed in paraformaldehyde solution. Each group was subdivided and underwent macroscopical investigation, microscopical investigation after unhinging stents and coils, and microscopical investigation including the endovascular devices. Histological analyses included immunohistochemical investigations for estimating the proliferation of the intima and possible inflammatory infiltration. Covered stents led to a complete and stable aneurysm occlusion with only minimal proliferative carrier vessel wall changes. Onlly mild in-stent stenosis was found in three animals after three months. The aneurysms were completely occluded with partly organized thrombotic material. Fibrotic changes were seen between the aneurysm wall and thrombus. Porous stents initially led to intraaneurysmatic blood flow alterations in 9 of 10 cases. But after one month only one aneurysm seemed occluded in angiography wereas 2 aneurysms showed complete occlusion in the three-month follow-up group. In one case progressive sprouting of neointima inside the carrier vessel was present, which resulted in a stenosis of up to 90%. Intraaneurysmatic thrombus organization was poor or even absent respectively. In the “Coil” group only 2 aneurysms demonstrated complete occlusion in angiography after one month. After three month all aneurysms were again perfused following coil compaction with visualisation of a neck remnant. The study demonstrates the possible shortcomings and problems of emerging “Stent-techniques” to treat intracerebral aneurysms and concludes the following aspects:1. Porous stents placed over the orifice of an aneurysm can alter blood flow paterns leading to reduced blood inflow or blood stasis within the aneurysm. Therefor induction and promotion of thrombus formation within the aneurysmal lumen is possible.2. However this method remains highly reliant on chance, since it seems unpredictable whether or not an aneurysm will be occluded on follow-up. Moreover, it has to be determined whether the occlusion of the aneurysm remains stable over time leading in a reduced risk of re-rupture.3. Covered stents led to complete and stable aneurysm occlusion and induced progressive thrombotic organization within the aneurysm.4. The prober delivery of the stent at the orifice of an aneurysm stays difficult, concerning parent vessel curvature, the navigation through intracanial arteries and the potential occlusion of small perforating arteries. 5. A tendency towards progressive vessel wall reaction should be considered for each stent. Though polyurethane coated stents seem to cause increased neointimal proliferation, possibly due to chronic inflammatory reactions. Therefor we presume that further advances in stent materials and coating might help to overcome this problems.
机译:导致蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)的脑动脉瘤破裂与高发病率和高死亡率相关。急性SAH再次破裂后再次出血的发生率超过20%,对患者构成严重威胁,往往造成毁灭性后果。因此,必须治疗破裂的动脉瘤。尽管Guglielmi可拆卸线圈(GDC)系统已被广泛接受为血管内治疗选择,但使用多孔支架,支架移植物或在放置支架后植入线圈来对动脉瘤进行一次主支架植入,是血管内治疗策略中正在兴起但仍是实验性技术。本研究的目的是使用一种动物模型来研究这些不同的方法来治疗脑动脉瘤,这些方法涉及支架置入后的闭合速率,动脉瘤腔内和亲代血管的组织病理学变化。通过远端结扎并用弹性蛋白酶对右颈总动脉进行腔内孵育,在30只兔中创建了动脉瘤。该酶消化了内部弹性层,从而导致如此形成的血管残端随后的动脉瘤扩张。用单独的多孔支架治疗10只动物,用支架移植物(聚氨酯覆盖的支架)治疗10只兔子。此外,通过使用可电解拆卸的线圈,用当前的金标准对10只动物进行了处理。观察每组五只动物1个月,观察其他动物3个月。在观察期之后,进行DSA系列以评估最终的血管造影结果。此后,将动物麻醉,将头臂干,右锁骨下动脉直至椎动脉和动脉瘤全部切除,并在低聚甲醛溶液中快速固定。将每组细分,并进行宏观检查,解开支架和线圈后的显微检查以及包括血管内装置的显微检查。组织学分析包括免疫组织化学研究,以估计内膜的增殖和可能的炎症浸润。覆盖的支架可导致完整而稳定的动脉瘤闭塞,而增殖性载体血管壁的变化很小。三个月后,仅在三只动物中发现了轻度的支架内狭窄。动脉瘤完全被部分组织的血栓物质阻塞。在动脉瘤壁和血栓之间可见纤维化变化。多孔支架最初导致10例中的9例发生动脉瘤内血流改变。但是一个月后,在三个月的随访组中,血管造影仅闭塞了一个动脉瘤,因为2个动脉瘤显示完全闭塞。在一种情况下,在承载血管内存在新内膜的逐渐萌芽,这导致高达90%的狭窄。动脉瘤内血栓的组织较差或什至没有。在“ Coil”组中,一个月后只有2个动脉瘤在血管造影中显示出完全闭塞。三个月后,在线圈压实并可见颈部残留后,再次灌注所有动脉瘤。研究表明了新兴的“支架技术”治疗脑动脉瘤的可能缺点和问题,并总结了以下几个方面:1。放置在动脉瘤孔口上的多孔支架会改变血流模式,从而导致动脉瘤内血液流入或血流淤积减少。因此有可能诱导和促进动脉瘤腔内血栓的形成。2。然而,这种方法仍然高度依赖偶然性,因为在随访中是否闭塞动脉瘤似乎是不可预测的。此外,必须确定动脉瘤的阻塞是否随时间推移保持稳定,从而降低再次破裂的风险。3。覆膜支架可导致动脉瘤完全稳定地闭塞,并在动脉瘤内引起进行性血栓形成。4。支架在动脉瘤孔处的探针递送仍然很困难,这涉及到母血管曲率,通过导管内动脉的导航以及小穿孔动脉的潜在阻塞。 5.对于每个支架,应考虑进行性血管壁反应的趋势。尽管涂有聚氨酯的支架似乎引起新内膜增生,可能是由于慢性炎症反应所致。因此,我们认为支架材料和涂层的进一步发展可能有助于克服这一问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stein Klaus-Peter;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 ger
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号