首页> 外文OA文献 >Training-specific functional, neural, and hypertrophic adaptations to explosive- vs. sustained-contraction strength training
【2h】

Training-specific functional, neural, and hypertrophic adaptations to explosive- vs. sustained-contraction strength training

机译:针对爆炸-持续收缩力量训练的特定训练功能,神经和肥大适应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Training specificity is considered important for strength training, although the functional and underpinning physiological adaptations to different types of training, including brief explosive contractions, are poorly understood. This study compared the effects of 12 wk of explosive-contraction (ECT, n = 13) vs. sustained-contraction (SCT, n = 16) strength training vs. control (n = 14) on the functional, neural, hypertrophic, and intrinsic contractile characteristics of healthy young men. Training involved 40 isometric knee extension repetitions (3 times/wk): contracting as fast and hard as possible for ∼1 s (ECT) or gradually increasing to 75% of maximum voluntary torque (MVT) before holding for 3 s (SCT). Torque and electromyography during maximum and explosive contractions, torque during evoked octet contractions, and total quadriceps muscle volume (QUADSVOL) were quantified pre and post training. MVT increased more after SCT than ECT [23 vs. 17%; effect size (ES) = 0.69], with similar increases in neural drive, but greater QUADSVOL changes after SCT (8.1 vs. 2.6%; ES = 0.74). ECT improved explosive torque at all time points (17-34%; 0.54 ≤ ES ≤ 0.76) because of increased neural drive (17-28%), whereas only late-phase explosive torque (150 ms, 12%; ES = 1.48) and corresponding neural drive (18%) increased after SCT. Changes in evoked torque indicated slowing of the contractile properties of the muscle-tendon unit after both training interventions. These results showed training-specific functional changes that appeared to be due to distinct neural and hypertrophic adaptations. ECT produced a wider range of functional adaptations than SCT, and given the lesser demands of ECT, this type of training provides a highly efficient means of increasing function.
机译:尽管对力量训练的功能和基础生理适应性(包括短暂的爆炸性收缩)了解得很少,但是训练特异性对于力量训练很重要。这项研究比较了12周爆发性收缩(ECT,n = 13)与持续收缩(SCT,n = 16)力量训练与对照(n = 14)对功能,神经,肥大性和健康年轻人的内在收缩特征。训练包括40次等距的膝盖伸展运动重复(3次/周):尽可能快且坚硬地收缩约1 s(ECT),或逐渐增加至最大自愿扭矩(MVT)的75%,然后再保持3 s(SCT)。在训练前后量化最大和爆炸性收缩期间的扭矩和肌电图,诱发八角形收缩期间的扭矩以及总股四头肌肌肉体积(QUADSVOL)。 SCT后MVT比ECT升高更多[23比17%;效应大小(ES)= 0.69],神经驱动类似增加,但SCT后QUADSVOL变化更大(8.1比2.6%; ES = 0.74)。 ECT在所有时间点都改善了爆炸扭矩(17-34%; 0.54≤ES≤0.76),这是因为神经驱动增加(17-28%),而只有后期爆炸扭矩(150 ms,12%; ES = 1.48) SCT后相应的神经驱动增加(18%)。诱发扭矩的变化表明两种训练干预后肌腱单元的收缩特性减慢。这些结果表明,特定于训练的功能变化似乎是由于独特的神经和肥大性适应。 ECT产生的功能适应性比SCT广泛,并且鉴于ECT的需求较少,这种训练提供了增加功能的高效手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号