首页> 外文OA文献 >Productivity and profitability on cotton-based production systems under organic and conventional management in India
【2h】

Productivity and profitability on cotton-based production systems under organic and conventional management in India

机译:印度有机和常规管理下基于棉花的生产系统的生产率和利润率

摘要

The debate on the relative benefits of conventional and organic farming systems is more topical than ever. The achievements of conventional high-input agriculture were based to a large extent on fossil fuels and largely brought about at the cost of deteriorating soil fertility. Developing more sustainable farming practices on a large scale is of utmost importance. However, information about the performance of farming systems under organic and conventional management in tropical and subtropical regions is sparse. This study presents agronomic and economic data from the conversion phase (2007-2010) of a farming systems comparison trial on a Vertisol soil in central India. A cotton-soybean-wheat crop rotation under biodynamic, organic and conventional (with and without genetically modified (GM) Bt cotton) management was investigated. We observed a significant yield gap between organic and conventional farming systems in the first crop rotation (cycle 1: 2007-2008) for cotton (-29%) and wheat (-27%), whereas in the second crop rotation (cycle 2: 2009-2010) yields were similar in all farming systems. Lower variable production costs in organic farming systems (-32%) led to similar gross margins in all systems, averaging 104’909 Indian rupees ha-1 (equivalent to 2’089 US Dollars ha-1) per crop rotation. Conventional farming systems achieved significantly higher gross margins in cycle 1 (+29%), whereas in cycle 2 gross margins in organic farming systems were significantly higher (+25%). Our findings show the potential benefits of organic farming systems under the premise that marginal farmers have access to knowledge, purchased inputs such as organic fertilizers, pesticides and non-GM seeds, and assuming that there is a market demand and well developed certification system. Future research needs to focus on the verification of our outcomes in further crop cycles, on geographically spread on-farm comparisons, and on the ecological impact of the different farming systems.
机译:关于常规和有机耕作制度的相对利益的辩论比以往任何时候都更具话题性。常规的高投入农业取得的成就在很大程度上以化石燃料为基础,并且主要是以土壤肥力恶化为代价的。大规模发展更可持续的农业实践至关重要。但是,关于热带和亚热带地区在有机和常规管理下的耕作制度的绩效的信息很少。这项研究提供了印度中部Vertisol土壤上一个耕作系统比较试验的转换阶段(2007-2010年)的农艺和经济数据。研究了生物动力,有机和常规(有和没有基因改造(GM)Bt棉花)管理下的棉花-大豆-小麦作物轮作。我们观察到,在第一轮作物轮作(周期1:2007-2008)中,有机棉花和常规耕作制度之间的棉花产量差距很大(-29%),小麦(-27%),而第二轮作物轮作(周期2: 2009-2010年)在所有耕作系统中的产量均相似。有机耕作系统较低的可变生产成本(-32%)导致所有系统的毛利率相近,每轮作物平均产生104'909印度卢比ha-1(相当于2'089美元ha-1)。常规耕作系统在第1周期的毛利率显着提高(+ 29%),而在第2周期,有机耕作系统的毛利率显着更高(+ 25%)。我们的研究结果表明,在边际农民拥有知识,购买有机肥料,农药和非转基因种子等投入品的前提下,并假设有市场需求和完善的认证体系的前提下,有机耕作制度的潜在好处。未来的研究需要着重于在进一步的农作周期中验证我们的成果,在地理上分散的农场比较以及不同耕作制度对生态的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号