首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Yield and Economic Performance of Organic and Conventional Cotton-Based Farming Systems – Results from a Field Trial in India
【2h】

Yield and Economic Performance of Organic and Conventional Cotton-Based Farming Systems – Results from a Field Trial in India

机译:有机和常规棉花种植系统的产量和经济绩效–印度实地试验的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The debate on the relative benefits of conventional and organic farming systems has in recent time gained significant interest. So far, global agricultural development has focused on increased productivity rather than on a holistic natural resource management for food security. Thus, developing more sustainable farming practices on a large scale is of utmost importance. However, information concerning the performance of farming systems under organic and conventional management in tropical and subtropical regions is scarce. This study presents agronomic and economic data from the conversion phase (2007–2010) of a farming systems comparison trial on a Vertisol soil in Madhya Pradesh, central India. A cotton-soybean-wheat crop rotation under biodynamic, organic and conventional (with and without Bt cotton) management was investigated. We observed a significant yield gap between organic and conventional farming systems in the 1st crop cycle (cycle 1: 2007–2008) for cotton (−29%) and wheat (−27%), whereas in the 2nd crop cycle (cycle 2: 2009–2010) cotton and wheat yields were similar in all farming systems due to lower yields in the conventional systems. In contrast, organic soybean (a nitrogen fixing leguminous plant) yields were marginally lower than conventional yields (−1% in cycle 1, −11% in cycle 2). Averaged across all crops, conventional farming systems achieved significantly higher gross margins in cycle 1 (+29%), whereas in cycle 2 gross margins in organic farming systems were significantly higher (+25%) due to lower variable production costs but similar yields. Soybean gross margin was significantly higher in the organic system (+11%) across the four harvest years compared to the conventional systems. Our results suggest that organic soybean production is a viable option for smallholder farmers under the prevailing semi-arid conditions in India. Future research needs to elucidate the long-term productivity and profitability, particularly of cotton and wheat, and the ecological impact of the different farming systems.
机译:最近,关于常规和有机耕作制度的相对利益的争论引起了极大的兴趣。迄今为止,全球农业发展侧重于提高生产率,而不是针对粮食安全的整体自然资源管理。因此,大规模发展更具可持续性的耕作方法至关重要。但是,关于热带和亚热带地区在有机和常规管理下耕作制度的绩效的信息很少。这项研究提供了印度中部中央邦维提索尔土壤耕作系统比较试验的转换阶段(2007-2010年)的农艺和经济数据。研究了生物动力,有机和常规(有和没有Bt棉花)管理下的棉花-大豆-小麦作物轮作。我们观察到,在第一 作物周期(周期1:2007-2008)中,有机棉和常规耕作系统之间的棉花和棉花(-29%)和小麦(-27%)之间存在明显的产量差距,而在第二 作物周期(周期2:2009-2010),由于常规耕作系统的较低收成,所有耕作系统的棉花和小麦收成均相似。相反,有机大豆(固氮豆科植物)的产量略低于常规产量(第1周期为-1%,第2周期为-11%)。在所有农作物中,传统农作系统的平均毛利率在第1周期显着提高(+ 29%),而在第2周期,由于可变生产成本较低但产量相似,有机耕作系统的毛利率显着更高(+ 25%)。与传统系统相比,在四个收获年度中,有机系统中的大豆毛利率显着更高(+ 11%)。我们的结果表明,在印度盛行的半干旱条件下,有机大豆生产对于小农来说是一种可行的选择。未来的研究需要阐明特别是棉花和小麦的长期生产力和盈利能力,以及不同耕作制度的生态影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号