首页> 外文OA文献 >Modelling non-linear exposure-disease relationships in a large individual participant meta-analysis allowing for the effects of exposure measurement error
【2h】

Modelling non-linear exposure-disease relationships in a large individual participant meta-analysis allowing for the effects of exposure measurement error

机译:在大型个体参与者荟萃分析中对非线性暴露-疾病关系进行建模,考虑到暴露测量误差的影响

摘要

This thesis was motivated by data from the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (ERFC), alarge individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of risk factors for coronary heart disease(CHD). Cardiovascular disease is the largest cause of death in almost all countries in the world, therefore it is important to be able to characterise the shape of risk factor–CHD relationships.Many of the risk factors for CHD considered by the ERFC are subject to substantial measurement error, and their relationship with CHD non-linear. We firstly consider issues associated with modelling the risk factor–disease relationship in a single study, before using meta-analysisto combine relationships across studies.It is well known that classical measurement error generally attenuates linear exposure–disease relationships, however its precise effect on non-linear relationships is less well understood. Weinvestigate the effect of classical measurement error on the shape of exposure–disease relationshipsthat are commonly encountered in epidemiological studies, and then consider methods for correcting for classical measurement error. We propose the application of a widely used correction method, regression calibration, to fractional polynomial models. We also considerthe effects of non-classical error on the observed exposure–disease relationship, and the impact on our correction methods when we erroneously assume classical measurement error.Analyses performed using categorised continuous exposures are common in epidemiology. Weshow that MacMahon’s method for correcting for measurement error in analyses that use categorised continuous exposures, although simple, does not provide the correct shape for nonlinear exposure–disease relationships. We perform a simulation study to compare alternative methods for categorised continuous exposures.Meta-analysis is the statistical synthesis of results from a number of studies addressing similar research hypotheses. The use of IPD is the gold standard approach because it allows for consistent analysis of the exposure–disease relationship across studies. Methods have recently been proposed for combining non-linear relationships across studies. We discuss these methods,extend them to P-spline models, and consider alternative methods of combining relationships across studies.We apply the methods developed to the relationships of fasting blood glucose and lipoprotein(a) with CHD, using data from the ERFC.
机译:本文的研究动机是来自新兴风险因素合作组织(ERFC)的数据,这是对冠心病(CHD)危险因素进行的大型个人参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析。心血管疾病是世界上几乎所有国家/地区最大的死亡原因,因此,重要的是要能够表征危险因素与CHD的关系。ERFC考虑的许多CHD危险因素都需要进行大量测量。误差及其与冠心病的非线性关系。在使用荟萃分析合并各个研究之间的关系之前,我们首先考虑在单个研究中建模风险因子-疾病关系的相关问题。众所周知,经典的测量误差通常会减弱线性暴露-疾病关系,但是其对非传染性疾病的精确影响-线性关系不太了解。我们调查了流行病学研究中常见的典型测量误差对暴露-疾病关系形状的影响,然后考虑了校正经典测量误差的方法。我们建议将广泛使用的校正方法(回归校准)应用于分数多项式模型。当我们错误地假设经典测量误差时,我们还考虑了非经典误差对观察到的暴露-疾病关系的影响,以及对我们校正方法的影响。使用分类连续暴露进行的分析在流行病学中很常见。我们展示了MacMahon在使用分类的连续曝光的分析中校正测量误差的方法,尽管很简单,但不能为非线性曝光-疾病关系提供正确的形状。我们进行模拟研究以比较分类连续暴露的替代方法。元分析是针对类似研究假设的许多研究结果的统计综合。 IPD的使用是金标准方法,因为它可以对研究之间的暴露-疾病关系进行一致的分析。最近提出了用于组合研究之间的非线性关系的方法。我们讨论了这些方法,将它们扩展到P样条模型,并考虑了跨研究组合关系的替代方法。我们使用ERFC的数据将开发的方法应用于空腹血糖和脂蛋白(a)与CHD的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号