首页> 外文OA文献 >Responsibility, inequality, efficiency, and equity in four sustainability paradigms: policies for a shared sea from a multi-country analytical model
【2h】

Responsibility, inequality, efficiency, and equity in four sustainability paradigms: policies for a shared sea from a multi-country analytical model

机译:四个可持续发展范式中的责任,不平等,效率和公平:来自多国分析模型的共享海洋政策

摘要

This paper develops a theoretical framework for four sustainability paradigms (weak sustainability, a-growth, de-growth, strong sustainability) within cooperative and non-cooperative scenarios, and includes changes in four values (a sense of responsibility to nature and future generations; aversion to inequality for current and future generations). The model assesses the feasibility of sustainability solutions for a shared environment as a function of specific value changes in each country by interpreting these value changes as support for environmental policies. The solutions are defined in terms of consumption, use of the environment, and welfare of representative individuals in each country; they are characterised by efficiency and equality at both intra- and inter-generational levels; they are checked for internal consistency and consistency with alternative approaches such as utilitarianism, egalitarianism (i.e., Arneson, Dworkin, Sen), and contractarianism. Theoretical insights are obtained by comparing contextual stability and relative effectiveness of the environment’s use among countries in alternative scenarios. A case study of the Baltic Sea operationally suggests that the currently adopted strong sustainability (i.e., an ecosystem approach) in a non-cooperative scenario (i.e., countries attempt to maximize their own rather than overall welfare) is internally consistent, relatively efficient, and consistent with Dworkin egalitarianism. A-growth was never feasible, but de-growth in which Denmark, Finland, Germany, and Sweden increase environmental protection would increase intra-generational equality; de-growth or weak sustainability in which Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Russia increase environmental R&D would increase intra- and inter-generational equality; weak sustainability and de-growth consistent with Arneson and Dworkin egalitarianism would improve the environmental status.
机译:本文为合作和非合作场景中的四个可持续性范式(弱可持续性,增长,消长,强可持续性)建立了理论框架,并包括了四个价值观的变化(对自然和后代的责任感;对今世后代的不平等感。该模型通过将这些价值变化解释为对环境政策的支持,根据每个国家的特定价值变化来评估共享环境可持续解决方案的可行性。解决方案是根据每个国家的代表消费,环境使用和福利来定义的;它们的特点是在代际和代际之间都具有效率和平等;检查它们的内部一致性和与其他方法的一致性,例如功利主义,平均主义(即Arneson,Dworkin,Sen)和契约主义。通过在替代方案中比较国家之间的环境稳定性和环境使用的相对有效性,可以获得理论上的见解。对波罗的海的一个案例研究表明,在非合作的情况下(即国家试图最大限度地提高自身而不是整体福利),当前采用的强有力的可持续性(即生态系统方法)在内部是一致的,相对有效的,并且与德沃金的平均主义相一致。增长从来都不可行,但如果丹麦,芬兰,德国和瑞典提高环境保护水平,则这种增长将加剧代际平等。增长不足或可持续性薄弱,爱沙尼亚,拉脱维亚,立陶宛,波兰和俄罗斯增加环境研发将增加代际和代际平等;与Arneson和Dworkin均等主义相一致的脆弱的可持续性和增长不足将改善环境状况。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zagonari Fabio;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号