首页> 外文OA文献 >When Doctors Shape Policy: The Impact of Self-Regulation on Governing Human Biotechnology.
【2h】

When Doctors Shape Policy: The Impact of Self-Regulation on Governing Human Biotechnology.

机译:当医生制定政策时:自我监管对人类生物技术治理的影响。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper investigates the development and adoption of governance modes in the field of human biotechnology. As the field of human biotechnology is relatively new, voluntary professional self-regulation constituted the initial governing mode. In the meantime, with the exception of Ireland, all Western European countries have moved towards greater state intervention. Nevertheless they have done so in contrasting ways and the resulting governance modes for assisted reproductive technology (ART) and embryonic stem-cell research vary greatly. Instead of imposing their steering capacity in a ‘top-down’ fashion, governments have taken pre-existing self-regulatory arrangements in the field into account and built up governance mechanisms in conjunction with private actors and pre-existing modes of private governance. Our analysis demonstrates that the form and content of the initial self-regulation explain why the self-steering capacity of the medical profession was largely or at least partially preserved through hybrid governance systems in Britain and in Germany, while in France the self-regulation was entirely replaced by governmental intervention.
机译:本文研究了人类生物技术领域中治理模式的发展和采用。由于人类生物技术领域是一个相对较新的领域,自愿的专业自我调节构成了最初的管理模式。同时,除爱尔兰外,所有西欧国家都已开始对国家进行更大程度的干预。尽管如此,他们却以相反的方式做到了这一点,辅助生殖技术(ART)和胚胎干细胞研究的最终治理模式也大相径庭。政府没有以“自上而下”的方式强加他们的指导能力,而是考虑了该领域先前存在的自我监管安排,并与私人行为者和私人治理的现有模式建立了治理机制。我们的分析表明,最初的自我监管的形式和内容可以解释为什么在英国和德国,医疗行业的自我指导能力是通过混合治理体系在很大程度上或至少部分得以保留的,而在法国,自我监管却是完全由政府干预取代。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号