首页> 外文OA文献 >Contre l'autonomie et la clôture du texte : formes et ambiguïtés de la fiction moderniste européenne : (1910-1939)
【2h】

Contre l'autonomie et la clôture du texte : formes et ambiguïtés de la fiction moderniste européenne : (1910-1939)

机译:反对自治和封闭文本:欧洲现代派小说的形式和含混之处:(1910-1939)

摘要

Although it has been a key concept of literary criticism in the English-speaking world for more than a half-century, modernism remains a relatively misunderstood notion in France, owing to its proximity to somewhat close concepts such as modernity and avant-garde, which it only partially overlaps. The concept is relevant to experimentation in all literary genres, but this study focuses on the novel, with texts by James Joyce, André Gide, Ramón Gómez de la Serna and Virginia Woolf. Those have often been mischaracterized by literary critics as either mimetic novels — though more realistic than realist novels — or more frequently as emblematic of the self-referential text, as defined by the dogmas of new criticism and structuralism. This study seeks an alternative to those two limited analytical options, particularly by using possible worlds theory, which is more susceptible of accounting for the modernist project of creating life rather than representing the real. The traditional definition of modernism as an ensemble of movements is therefore confronted to a new perspective which allows for its analysis as a particular ethics and praxis of fiction: the fictional worlds built by experimental novels of the early twentieth century are ambiguous, caught between tradition and modernity, since modernist texts, in becoming the living memory of literature, refuse to erase the past completely. This study thus proposes to establish a critical cartography, one that will allow the reader to access a terra incognita of French comparative studies.
机译:尽管在过去的半个多世纪中,它一直是英语世界中文学批评的重要概念,但由于在现代性方面与现代性和前卫主义等较接近的概念相近,现代主义在法国仍然是一个相对被误解的概念。它仅部分重叠。这个概念与所有文学体裁的实验都有关,但这项研究集中在小说上,詹姆斯·乔伊斯(James Joyce),安德烈·基德(AndréGide),拉蒙·戈麦斯·德拉塞尔纳(RamónGómezde la Serna)和弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫(Virginia Woolf)的著作。这些批评家常被文学评论家误解为要么是模仿小说-尽管比现实主义小说更现实-要么更多地是象征自我参照的文本,这是新批评和结构主义的教条所定义的。本研究寻求这两个有限的分析选择的替代方法,特别是通过使用可能的世界理论,该理论更易于解释创造生命的现代主义项目,而不是代表真实。因此,对现代主义作为运动整体的传统定义面临着一个新的视角,可以将其作为一种特殊的伦理学和小说的实践进行分析:由二十世纪初期的实验小说所建立的虚构世界是模棱两可的,介于传统与现实之间。现代性,因为现代主义文本在成为文学的鲜活记忆时,拒绝完全抹去过去。因此,本研究建议建立一种重要的制图学,使读者可以访问法国比较研究的地名。

著录项

  • 作者

    Piégay Victor-Arthur;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 fr
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号