首页> 外文OA文献 >Fire safety management in heritage buildings: a case study inudMalaysiaud
【2h】

Fire safety management in heritage buildings: a case study inudMalaysiaud

机译:文物建筑的消防安全管理:以 ud为例的案例研究马来西亚 ud

摘要

In Malaysia, there are few heritage buildings with an architectural and historicaludsignificance that may classified into several categories, namely traditional timber Malayudhouses, pre-world war shop-houses, colonial office buildings, institutional buildings andudreligious buildings. Many of them are worthy to be listed as Heritage Buildings orudNational Heritage buildings under the National Heritage Act 2005 (Act 645). Howeveruddue to poor fire safety management, many priceless heritage buildings were badlyuddamaged or burnt down by fire e.g. Muzium Rakyat, Melaka (2001), Rumah Pak Ali,udGombak (2003) and Sarawak Club, Kuching (2006).It is widely accepted that fire is oneudof the greatest threats not only to the building’s occupants but also to the building’sudfabric and contents. Nevertheless, in term of fire safety approach, a heritage buildingudrequires relatively more sensitive approach compare to a new building; a high standardudof fire safety management is required, not only to protect people but as well as to protectudhistorical contents, fabrics and structures of the building. This paper suggests someudrecommendations to provide a satisfactory level of fire safety management in a heritageudbuilding.
机译:在马来西亚,几乎没有具有建筑和历史非重要意义的文物建筑,可以分为几类,即传统的木材马来文房屋,战前战争商店,殖民地办公楼,机构建筑和宗教建筑。其中许多值得根据《 2005年国家遗产法》(第645号法案)列为遗产建筑或“国家遗产建筑”。但是,由于缺乏良好的消防安全管理,许多无价的文物建筑被火灾严重损坏,毁坏或烧毁,例如Muzium Rakyat,Melaka(2001),Rumah Pak Ali, udGombak(2003)和Sarawak Club,Kuching(2006)。人们普遍认为,火灾不仅是对建筑物使用者的最大威胁,也是对建筑物的最大威胁。 udfabric和内容。然而,就消防安全方法而言,与新建筑物相比,传统建筑需要相对敏感的方法。需要高标准的 udof消防安全管理,不仅要保护人员,还要保护建筑物的历史内容,织物和结构。本文提出了一些建议,以便在遗产 udbuilding中提供令人满意的消防安全管理水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号