首页> 外文OA文献 >A Comparison Study for Chloride-Binding Capacity between Alkali-Activated Fly Ash and Slag in the Use of Seawater
【2h】

A Comparison Study for Chloride-Binding Capacity between Alkali-Activated Fly Ash and Slag in the Use of Seawater

机译:碱活化粉煤灰与矿渣在海水中氯离子结合能力的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study aimed to investigate the chloride-binding capacity of alkali-activated fly ash (denoted as FSW) and slag (denoted as SSW) samples and their synthesized Cl-bearing phases, which are capable of binding and immobilizing chloride when seawater is used as the mixing water. This study also examined the progressive changes in the pore structures of the FSW and SSW samples over time. The results show that the SSW sample is significantly more effective in the uptake of chloride ions compared to the FSW sample at 28 days of curing. While the FSW sample forms Cl-bearing zeolites (Cl-chabazite and Cl-sodalite) (possibly with similar types of geopolymeric gels), the SSW sample synthesizes Cl-bearing, layered double hydroxides (LDH) (Cl-hydrocalumite and Cl-hydrotalcite). Although both samples involve Cl-binding phases, the FSW sample is likely to be less efficient because it largely produces zeolites (or similar geopolymeric gels) with no Cl-binding capability (i.e., zeolites X and Y). Meanwhile, the SSW sample produces Cl-bearing LDH phases as well as C-S-H(I), which can physically adsorb chloride. The SSW sample exhibits both pore-size refinement and porosity reduction over time, while the FSW sample only exhibits pore-size refinement. Therefore, the SSW system is more advantageous in the use of seawater because it more effectively prevents Cl ingression due to greater impermeability.
机译:这项研究旨在研究碱活化粉煤灰(表示为FSW)和矿渣(表示为SSW)样品及其合成的含Cl相的氯化物结合能力,当使用海水作为水时,它们能够结合并固定氯化物。混合水。这项研究还研究了FSW和SSW样品的孔结构随时间的变化。结果表明,在固化28天时,与FSW样品相比,SSW样品在吸收氯离子方面更为有效。当FSW样品形成含Cl的沸石(Cl-菱沸石和Cl-苏打粉)(可能具有相似类型的地质聚合物凝胶)时,SSW样品合成含Cl的层状双氢氧化物(LDH)(Cl-水钙铝石和Cl-水滑石) )。尽管两个样品都涉及Cl结合相,但FSW样品效率可能较低,因为它会大量生产没有Cl结合能力的沸石(或类似的地质聚合物凝胶)(即X和Y沸石)。同时,SSW样品产生了含Cl的LDH相以及C-S-H(I),可以物理吸附氯化物。 SSW样品随时间显示出孔径细化和孔隙率降低,而FSW样品仅显示出孔径细化。因此,SSW系统在海水的使用中更有利,因为它由于更大的不可渗透性而更有效地防止了Cl的进入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号