首页> 外文OA文献 >Embodied ideas and divided selves: revisiting Laing via Bakhtin
【2h】

Embodied ideas and divided selves: revisiting Laing via Bakhtin

机译:体现思想和自我分裂:通过巴赫金重新审视莱因

摘要

In this article, we apply Mikhail Bakhtin's model of a 'divided self' to R.D. Laing's eponymous work on the lived experience of divided selves in 'psychosis'. Both of these authors offer intriguing insights into the fracturing of self through its social relationships (including the 'micro-dialogues' staged for oneself) but from uniquely different perspectives. Bakhtin (1984) uses Dostoevsky's novels as his material for a theory of self, centrally concerned with moments of split identity, crisis, and personal transformation, while Laing relies on his patient's accounts of 'psychosis'. We will outline how two key Bakhtinian divisions of the self (spirit/soul and authoritative/internally persuasive discourse) help to make sense of Laing's descriptions of his patient's experiences and micro-dialogues. Conversely, when refracted through Laing's phenomenology Bakhtin's account of the self becomes richer and somewhat darkened in terms of a double-edged ontology, which describes a maximally open self but one that is consumed by ideas, unable to manage their contradictions. The implications of this for managing the dilemmas of self-identity will be drawn out.
机译:在本文中,我们将米哈伊尔·巴赫金(Mikhail Bakhtin)的“分裂自我”模型应用到R.D. Laing的同名作品中,探讨了“精神病”中分裂自我的生活经历。两位作者都通过独特的视角对通过自我的社会关系(包括为自己上演的“微对话”)提供了有趣的见解。巴赫金(Bakhtin,1984)用陀思妥耶夫斯基的小说作为自我理论的材料,主要关注身份认同分裂,危机和个人转变的时刻,而莱因则依赖患者对“精神病”的描述。我们将概述巴赫金自我的两个关键部分(精神/灵魂和权威/内部说服性话语)如何帮助理解Laing对患者经历和微观对话的描述。相反,当通过莱因的现象学进行折射时,巴赫金对自我的描述变得更加丰富,并且在双刃本体论的意义上变得更加暗淡,该本体描述了一个最大程度开放的自我,但却被观念所消耗,无法解决它们的矛盾。将会指出这对于解决自我认同困境的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号