首页> 外文OA文献 >How far can it be argued that rationality of modernity creates a dehumanised and disenchanted self?
【2h】

How far can it be argued that rationality of modernity creates a dehumanised and disenchanted self?

机译:可以说现代性的合理性造就了一种非人性化的,迷惑的自我?

摘要

This essay seeks to discover just how far it can be argued that rationality of modernity can do so by focusing on various theorists and their position on the subject. Max Weber is a key philosopher whose perspective is considered throughout the discourse of the essay on topics such as secularisation, capitalism, formal rationality, bureaucracy and ‘iron cages’ which imprison the self. Ritzer’s theory of ‘McDonaldization’ is also considered, arguing that his specific tenets of control and efficiency lead to dehumanisation. This is concurred by Bryman and his postulations of ‘emotional labour’. Marxist theory is also accounted for, around the subject of reification; the transformation of the consciousness of a human into an object. The extreme depths of the argument surrounding the rationality of modernity are presented through applying the theories to the nature of the Nazi Holocaust. Finally, consideration is given as to how to re-humanise and re-enchant the self through postmodernist observation and a case study on the power of community.
机译:本文旨在通过关注各种理论家及其在主题上的立场,来发现现代性的合理性可以做到多大的争议。麦克斯·韦伯(Max Weber)是一位重要的哲学家,他在论文的整个论述中都围绕着世俗化,资本主义,形式理性,官僚主义和“铁笼”来监禁自我。还考虑了Ritzer的“麦当劳化”理论,认为他控制和效率的特定原则会导致非人性化。这是由布赖曼(Bryman)及其“情感劳动”的假设所同意的。围绕着具体化的主题也解释了马克思主义理论。从人的意识到物体的转化。通过将理论应用于纳粹大屠杀的性质,提出了围绕现代性合理性的论证的极端深度。最后,考虑了如何通过后现代主义的观察以及关于社区力量的案例研究,如何使人性化和重新自我化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jefferson Robert John;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号