首页> 外文OA文献 >Social media and the slow death throes of diachrony
【2h】

Social media and the slow death throes of diachrony

机译:社交媒体与历久弥新的历久弥新

摘要

Over the course of the twentieth century (and now into the twenty first), numerous iterations of new media have been accused of compressing time to the point at which we experience nothing but a perpetual present. In practice, however, these claims always seem somewhat overblown: even in an age of 24-hour news, ubiquitous mobile communication, and high-speed broadband, time has not been obliterated in the manner portended by pessimists. What I wish to argue in this paper is that all media involving the storage of information, from early modes of writing onward, necessarily en- gender a negotiated tension between synchrony and diachrony. More specifically, I will examine social media as a paradigmatic example of that which Wolfgang Ernst describes as the displacement of the spatialized archive by its temporalized equivalent. Platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, In- stagram, etc. are premised upon the storage of seemingly diachronic data for (what seems like) per- petuity, and yet, at the same time, the dynamic, generative, and procedural operability of this ar- chived data undermines its historical temporality (that is, its deferral) in favour of an apparently in- stantaneous presence formed in the feedback loop between the user and the mnemotechnical effects of these social media. Faced with such social media as forms of synchronic archival on the one hand, and their ephemeral competitors on the other, which deliberately forego archival in the name of privacy, we see in effect two divergent modes of synchronous temporality: in the former case, practices of archival result in a compression of past, present, and future into a single, continuous present; in the latter, the disavowal of archival (at least in theory), results in a very different form of communicative immediacy, more reminiscent of pre-literate orality (without directly replicating such circumstances). Such distinctions, I argue, must be kept in mind when studying the temporal effects of social media.
机译:在二十世纪的整个过程中(现在进入二十一世纪),新媒体的无数次迭代都被指控将时间压缩到了一个永恒的时刻。然而,实际上,这些主张似乎总是有些夸张:即使在24小时新闻,无处不在的移动通信和高速宽带的时代,时间也并没有像悲观主义者所预言的那样消灭时间。我希望在本文中提出的观点是,从早期的写作模式开始,所有涉及信息存储的媒体都必然会在同步性和历时之间造成协商性的紧张。更具体地说,我将社交媒体作为沃尔夫冈·恩斯特(Wolfgang Ernst)描述为空间化档案的时间化等效性的替代的范例。诸如Facebook,Twitter,Instagram等平台的前提是存储看似历时性的数据(看起来像)是永久性的,但与此同时,该数据的动态,生成性和过程可操作性归档的数据破坏了它的历史时空性(即它的延期),有利于在用户与这些社交媒体的辅助技术效果之间的反馈回路中形成明显的瞬时存在。一方面面对着同步存档形式的社交媒体,另一方面面对着短暂的竞争对手,它们以隐私的名义故意放弃了存档,实际上,我们看到了两种不同的同步时间性模式:在前一种情况下,实践归档结果将过去,现在和将来压缩为一个连续的当前状态;在后者中,档案的拒绝(至少在理论上是这样)导致了交流即时性的一种截然不同的形式,使人联想到识字前的口头表达(没有直接复制这种情况)。我认为,在研究社交媒体的时间效应时必须牢记这些区别。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sutherland Thomas;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:21:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号