首页> 外文OA文献 >Figure of merit comparison of PP-based electret and PVDF-based piezoelectric polymer energy harvesters
【2h】

Figure of merit comparison of PP-based electret and PVDF-based piezoelectric polymer energy harvesters

机译:PP基驻极体和PVDF基压电聚合物能量收集器的性能比较图

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The harvesting of mechanical strain and kinetic energy has received great attention over the past two decades in order to power wireless electronic components such as those used in passive and active monitoring applications. Piezoelectric ceramics, such as PZT (lead zirconate titanate), constitute the most commonly used electromechanical interface in vibration energy harvesters. However, there are applications in which piezoelectric ceramics cannot be used due to their low allowable curvature and brittle nature. Soft polymer PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) is arguably the most popular non-ceramic soft piezoelectric energy harvester material for such scenarios. Another type of polymer that has received less attention is PP (polypropylene) for electret-based energy harvesting using the thickness mode (33-mode). This work presents figure of merit comparison of PP versus PVDF for off-resonant energy harvesting in thickness mode operation, revealing substantial advantage of PP over PVDF. For thickness-mode energy harvesting scenarios (e.g. dynamic compression) at reasonable ambient vibration frequencies, the figure of merit for the maximum power output is proportional to the square of the effective piezoelectric strain constant divided by the effective permittivity constant. Under optimal conditions and for the same volume, it is shown that PP can generate more than two orders of magnitude larger electrical power as compared to PVDF due to the larger effective piezoelectric strain constant and lower permittivity of the former.
机译:在过去的二十年中,机械应变和动能的收集受到了极大的关注,以便为无线电子组件提供动力,例如用于无源和有源监视应用中的那些组件。压电陶瓷,例如PZT(钛酸锆钛酸铅)构成了振动能量收集器中最常用的机电接口。然而,由于压电陶瓷的低容许曲率和脆性,在某些应用中不能使用压电陶瓷。对于这种情况,软聚合物PVDF(聚偏二氟乙烯)可以说是最受欢迎的非陶瓷软压电能量收集器材料。另一类受到较少关注的聚合物是PP(聚丙烯),用于使用厚度模式(33模式)进行驻极体能量收集。这项工作提出了将PP与PVDF在厚度模式操作中用于非共振能量收集的优值比较,揭示了PP与PVDF相比的实质优势。对于在合理的环境振动频率下的厚度模式能量收集场景(例如动态压缩),最大功率输出的品质因数与有效压电应变常数的平方除以有效介电常数成正比。结果表明,在最佳条件下,对于相同的体积,由于PVDF的有效压电应变常数较大且介电常数较低,因此与PVDF相比,PP可以产生两个数量级以上的电功率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号