首页> 外文OA文献 >Being and thinking in the social world : phenomenological illuminations of social cognition and human selfhood
【2h】

Being and thinking in the social world : phenomenological illuminations of social cognition and human selfhood

机译:社会世界中的存在与思考:社会认知与人类自我的现象学阐释

摘要

At least since the time of Aristotle, it has been widely accepted that “man is by nature a social animal”. We eat, sleep, talk, laugh, cry, love, fight and create in ways that integrally depend on others and the social norms that we collectively generate and maintain. ududYet in spite of the widely accepted importance of human sociality in underlying our daily activities, its exact manifestation and function is consistently overlooked by many academic disciplines. Cognitive science, for example, regularly neglects the manner in which social interactions and interactively generated norms canalise and constitute our cognitive processes. Without the inescapable ubiquity of dynamic social norms, any given agent simply could not cognise as a human. ududIn this thesis, I aim to use a range of insights – from phenomenology, social psychology, neuroscience, cultural anthropology and gender studies – to clarify the role of sociality for human life. More specifically, the thesis can be broadly separated into three parts. I begin (chapters 1 and 2) with a broad explanation of how human agents are fundamentally tied to worldly entities and other agents in a way that characterises their ontological existence. In chapters 3 and 4, I criticise two recent and much-discussed theories of social cognition – namely, we-mode cognition and participatory sense-making – for failing to make intelligible the social constitution of human existence. In the later chapters (5-7), I then propose foundations for a more satisfactory theory of social cognition, as well as explicating a view of human selfhood as ‘biosocial’, such that even the autonomy of biological bodies is socially codified from a human perspective. ududTaken together, the aforementioned chapters should contribute to calls for a new direction in social cognitive science, whilst also yielding novel insights into the nature of human selfhood.
机译:至少从亚里士多德时代起,“人天生就是一种社会动物”已被广泛接受。我们吃饭,睡觉,说话,笑,哭,爱,战斗和创造,其方式完全取决于他人以及我们共同产生和维持的社会规范。 ud ud尽管人类社会性在我们的日常活动中被广泛接受,但其确切的表现和功能却被许多学科始终忽视。例如,认知科学经常忽略社会互动和互动产生的规范规范和构成我们的认知过程的方式。没有动态社会规范的不可避免的普遍性,任何给定的行为者都根本无法认出是人类。 ud ud在本文中,我旨在运用一系列的见解-现象学,社会心理学,神经科学,文化人类学和性别研究-来阐明社会性在人类生活中的作用。更具体地说,论文可以大致分为三个部分。首先(第1章和第2章),我们将对人类代理如何从根本上与世俗实体和其他代理联系在一起,以一种表征其本体存在的方式进行广泛的解释。在第3章和第4章中,我批评了近来备受关注的两种社会认知理论,即我们模式认知和参与式意识建构,因为它们未能使人类生存的社会构成变得难以理解。在随后的章节(5-7)中,我为更令人满意的社会认知理论提供了基础,并阐明了人类自我为“生物社会”的观点,这样即使是生物体的自治也可以从人类的社会中得到编纂。人类的视角。综上所述,以上各章应有助于呼吁社会认知科学的新方向,同时也应产生对人类自我本质的新颖见解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Higgins Joe;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-31 14:40:52

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号